🚀 go-pugleaf

Roger wrote:
> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>    (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>       someone claiming to be ataturkey wrote
>          in message
> <1143817003.201500.138700@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >Roger wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> Dare say, this looks a whole lot like defamation of character.  And I don't
> >> >> >> >> even agree with McVay on the core issues of Nizkor.
>
> >> >> >> >It is a shame that people resort to garbage like this and it is even a
> >> >> >> >bigger shame that it goes on on both sides.
>
> >> >> >> No, the shame is that I don't think you even realize that your lie
> >> >> >> that "it goes on on both sides" is exactly that.
>
> >> >> >I know for a fact that your side does call people from pay phones to
> >> >> >harass the families of those your side does not agree with.
>
> >> >> And your proof that anyone here has done this is ... ?
>
> >> >"Nazihunter" was recently exposed for doing exactly that.
>
> >> And by that act, demonstrated that zie was *not* on "my side."
>
> >He was harassing those who disagreed with the propaganda put out by
> >your side.
>
> My side does not put out propaganda -- and that he targeted deniers
> does not make him on "my side."
>
> >> And the identity of "nazihunter" has never been determined.
>
> >He was recently exposed.
>
> As several different people, if one were to believe your source.
>
> >He is making his obscene and threatening calls from Canada.
>
> Ah, so all of Canada is not only "nazihunter" and on "my side?"
>
> >> When those posts were being made, "my side" routinely condemned them
> >> -- can you point to any such from deniers about these "lisa"
> >> forgeries?
>
> >I think that these "lisa" posts are disgusting and so is "nazihunter".
>
> Okay.  *One*. *And* it took my prodding to make you do it.

No prodding was ever required. I condemn and condemned unprincipled,
cowardly conduct regardless of which sides is responsible for it.


>
> >There are only a handful of people on these lists who are able to
> >handle differences of opinions without name calling. The only one who
> >comes to mind is Al Smith.
>
> LOL -- riiiiiiiiiight.

Al Smith does not post often and tries (no one is totally unbiased) to
be unbiased with his opinions and does not resort to name calling. I
cannot think of anyone else who comes even close.



>
> >There could be one or two others.
>
> >> >> >It is a
> >> >> >disgusting and cowardly thing to do and is the main cause of people no
> >> >> >longer posting under their real names. You should be ashamed for
> >> >> >shameful conduct of your side just as the other side should be ashamed
> >> >> >for the shameful conduct of their side.