🚀 go-pugleaf

"ataturkey" <ataturkey@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1143875178.235380.234710@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Roger wrote:
>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>>    (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>>       someone claiming to be ataturkey wrote
>>          in message
>> <1143817003.201500.138700@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >Roger wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Dare say, this looks a whole lot like defamation of 
>> >> >> >> >> character.  And I don't
>> >> >> >> >> even agree with McVay on the core issues of Nizkor.
>>
>> >> >> >> >It is a shame that people resort to garbage like this and it is 
>> >> >> >> >even a
>> >> >> >> >bigger shame that it goes on on both sides.
>>
>> >> >> >> No, the shame is that I don't think you even realize that your 
>> >> >> >> lie
>> >> >> >> that "it goes on on both sides" is exactly that.
>>
>> >> >> >I know for a fact that your side does call people from pay phones 
>> >> >> >to
>> >> >> >harass the families of those your side does not agree with.
>>
>> >> >> And your proof that anyone here has done this is ... ?
>>
>> >> >"Nazihunter" was recently exposed for doing exactly that.
>>
>> >> And by that act, demonstrated that zie was *not* on "my side."
>>
>> >He was harassing those who disagreed with the propaganda put out by
>> >your side.
>>
>> My side does not put out propaganda -- and that he targeted deniers
>> does not make him on "my side."
>>
>> >> And the identity of "nazihunter" has never been determined.
>>
>> >He was recently exposed.
>>
>> As several different people, if one were to believe your source.
>>
>> >He is making his obscene and threatening calls from Canada.
>>
>> Ah, so all of Canada is not only "nazihunter" and on "my side?"
>>
>> >> When those posts were being made, "my side" routinely condemned them
>> >> -- can you point to any such from deniers about these "lisa"
>> >> forgeries?
>>
>> >I think that these "lisa" posts are disgusting and so is "nazihunter".
>>
>> Okay.  *One*. *And* it took my prodding to make you do it.
>
> No prodding was ever required. I condemn and condemned unprincipled,
> cowardly conduct regardless of which sides is responsible for it.
>
>
>>
>> >There are only a handful of people on these lists who are able to
>> >handle differences of opinions without name calling. The only one who
>> >comes to mind is Al Smith.
>>
>> LOL -- riiiiiiiiiight.
>
> Al Smith does not post often and tries (no one is totally unbiased) to
> be unbiased with his opinions and does not resort to name calling. I
> cannot think of anyone else who comes even close.

You've forgotten all about moi.

I don't resort to name calling. I simply post honest descriptors for the 
hook nosed lying cunts.