Article View: bc.general
Article #63889Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program
From: Michael Stemper
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 13:37
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 13:37
35 lines
2768 bytes
2768 bytes
In article <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>, markbr%radian@natinst.com (mark) writes: ><snip> >> And if I could make a loud, clear, crisp, affirmative >> statement to this whole net, if I could know EXACTLY >> how much I was required to pay for HOW LONG, then >> at least half of my aggressive pissed off attutude would dissapear. > >??? My divorce decree spells it out quite clearly. The only thing that I >dislike about it is something that *I*, stupidly, insisted on putting in >(a minimum child support amount - at the time, I was not considering that >I might hit a Depression, and wind up unemployed for a length of time, as >I did a couple of years ago). I hate to have to point this out, but the fact that it's spelled out quite clearly is irrelevant. If your income goes up, the CP can immediately file for and receive an increase in CS payments. If you file for a change in custody, the CP can file for and receive and increase in CS payments, based simply on the fact that you have enough money to afford a lawyer. If you marry (or have a live-in friend), the CP can file for and receive an increase in CS payments based on the fact that your household income has gone up. If October 1993 comes, the state will file for and receive an increase in CS payments based on the fact that the Federal government told them to. What if you lose your job? If six months goes by, you might be allowed to file for a slight reduction. Assuming that you continued to faithfully make all CS payments without income. Assuming that it wasn't decided that you were "voluntarily unemployed". Assuming that the CP didn't decide to call you a child abuser. -- #include <Standard_Disclaimer.h> Michael F. Stemper Power Systems Consultant mstemper@empros.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C7A0IF.FGK@empros.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!uum1!fs!nntp_server!empros.com!mstemperReferences:
<k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fea40,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gidfea40,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-19 07:20:59 PST Newsgroups: bc.general,alt.child-support,can.politics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!uum1!fs!nntp_server!empros.com!mstemper From: mstemper@empros.com (Michael Stemper) Subject: Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program Sender: news@empros.com (ems-news) Message-ID: <C7A0IF.FGK@empros.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 13:37:27 GMT Reply-To: mstemper@empros.com References: <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp> Nntp-Posting-Host: mickey.empros.com Organization: Empros Power Systems Control Lines: 35