🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bc.general
Article #63889

Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program

#63889
From: Michael Stemper
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 13:37
35 lines
2768 bytes
In article <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>, markbr%radian@natinst.com (mark) writes:
><snip>
>>	And if I could make a loud, clear, crisp, affirmative
>>	statement to this whole net, if I could know EXACTLY
>>	how much I was required to pay for HOW LONG, then
>>	at least half of my aggressive pissed off attutude would dissapear.
>
>??? My divorce decree spells it out quite clearly. The only thing that I
>dislike about it is something that *I*, stupidly, insisted on putting in
>(a minimum child support amount - at the time, I was not considering that
>I might hit a Depression, and wind up unemployed for a length of time, as
>I did a couple of years ago).

I hate to have to point this out, but the fact that it's spelled out quite
clearly is irrelevant. If your income goes up, the CP can immediately file
for and receive an increase in CS payments. If you file for a change in
custody, the CP can file for and receive and increase in CS payments, based
simply on the fact that you have enough money to afford a lawyer. If you
marry (or have a live-in friend), the CP can file for and receive an
increase in CS payments based on the fact that your household income has
gone up. If October 1993 comes, the state will file for and receive an
increase in CS payments based on the fact that the Federal government
told them to.

What if you lose your job? If six months goes by, you might be allowed to
file for a slight reduction. Assuming that you continued to faithfully
make all CS payments without income. Assuming that it wasn't decided that
you were "voluntarily unemployed". Assuming that the CP didn't decide to
call you a child abuser.

-- 
#include <Standard_Disclaimer.h>
Michael F. Stemper
Power Systems Consultant
mstemper@empros.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C7A0IF.FGK@empros.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!uum1!fs!nntp_server!empros.com!mstemper
References: <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fea40,92d47cd4838634cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidfea40,public
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,92d47cd4838634cf
X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public
X-Google-Thread: fb374,92d47cd4838634cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-19 07:20:59 PST
Newsgroups: bc.general,alt.child-support,can.politics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!uum1!fs!nntp_server!empros.com!mstemper
From: mstemper@empros.com (Michael Stemper)
Subject: Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program
Sender: news@empros.com (ems-news)
Message-ID: <C7A0IF.FGK@empros.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 13:37:27 GMT
Reply-To: mstemper@empros.com
References: <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>
Nntp-Posting-Host: mickey.empros.com
Organization: Empros Power Systems Control
Lines: 35