Article View: bc.general
Article #63888Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program
From: Alan Yasutovich
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 12:30
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 12:30
63 lines
3320 bytes
3320 bytes
In article <ZD9P4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> lisa@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca writes:
>yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) writes:
>> In case you missed my story, I didn't see either of them
>> for 10 years. Then, 7 years into my next marriage
>> and one new baby, they barge in. THis, after being
>> shunned, told to take a walk, and leave them alone.
>>
>> this kid doesn't even go by his real last name; MINE.
>>
>> And he wants "birthrights"?
>>
>Alan,
>
>I think it very sad that you apparently hold your own child son responsible
>for his mother's actions/decisions. Her influence seems apparent and thus your
>son continues to be victimized by both her bitterness and your own.
I agree.
>> That's why the "cash-cow" thing. Maybe I'm coming
>> from a different direction. But things/people STILL
>> pop out from the woodwork.
>>
>> Don't people have a right to know exactly what is
>> expected from them so they can plan accordingly?
>
>As you well know, our children see their father at least every two weeks and
>when possible, more often than that. No one is "popping out of the woodwork"
>here. In fact, it was my ex who initiated our current court proceedings!
>Mark makes an astute observation in pointing out the inequities of a
>custodial parent having to be 100% financially responsible for their
>children after divorce...only difference is, my ex didn't walk away from his
>kids, only from his parental responsibilities for them.
>
>Anyway, as my dear father has pointed out, your comments in this thread have
>nothing to do with the FMEP (in my case, at least) nor with anything related
>to my original post. I didn't ask my ex for copies of those garnisheed
>chequestubs -- I didn't even know they existed! I did ask the FMEP about them
>(once my ex's attorney presented them to me) and subsequently, about when
>those funds were returned, which they refused to divulge.
>
>Jeesh!
>
>---
>Lisa Lambeth lisa@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca
>Nanaimo, B.C.
>Canada NEXT?
I agree again.
(Off goes Lisa to have a coronary)
--
Alan Yasutovich
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this posting are mine
solely and do not represent my employer in any way.
"inquiring (and nosey) minds WANT TO KNOW!!!"
I can remember when "safe sex" meant having a padded headboard!!
Tick Tock.....Tick Tock......Tick Tock .....Tick Tock......
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993May19.123037.5363@ll.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!uhog.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!ll.mit.edu!yasuReferences:
<1993May17.192642.29532@ll.mit.edu> <ZD9P4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: fea40,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gidfea40,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-19 06:21:24 PST Newsgroups: bc.general,alt.child-support,can.politics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!uhog.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!ll.mit.edu!yasu From: yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) Subject: Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program Message-ID: <1993May19.123037.5363@ll.mit.edu> Sender: news@ll.mit.edu Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory References: <1993May17.192642.29532@ll.mit.edu> <ZD9P4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> Date: Wed, 19 May 93 12:30:37 GMT Lines: 63