Article View: bc.general
Article #63887Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program
From: mark
Date: Tue, 18 May 1993 17:45
Date: Tue, 18 May 1993 17:45
44 lines
3149 bytes
3149 bytes
In article <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) writes: >In article <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> lisa@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca writes: >>Well, the taxpayer-funded, privately operated FMEP did it again. ><snip> >>FMEP o advise me of when those funds were returned to him. They then informed >>me that as I was no longer enrolled with them, they would not give me that >>information. They are aware of the fact that my court proceedings concerning >>the matter of child support arrears will resume this Monday. In other words, >>my ex has copies of the chequestubs reflecting the garnishees - and therefore, >>indicating payments towards arrears -- while I have nothing to show that those >>funds were subsequently returned to him by the FMEP. <snip>> <I'm still not sure what the post below has to do with the one above, but...> > You know, *I* have never been "given" anything. I support > myself (and several hundred others). and my wife is from the > same "school". > > I don't think that anyone wants to receive public assisitance > of any kind; it's degrading. > > But there are people who have nothing better to do with their > time than graze around looking for "free stuff". Things they ??? Are you saying that there are people who *do* want to receive public assistance, as opposed to the sentence above? > can coolect on to better their own lot, rather than just > living and working like everyone else. It's the basis > for our "sue crazed" society, and 90% of the lawyer commercials > we see on TV. That I'll agree with."I ain't responsible, it's *gotta* be someone else's fault. <snip> > And if I could make a loud, clear, crisp, affirmative > statement to this whole net, if I could know EXACTLY > how much I was required to pay for HOW LONG, then > at least half of my aggressive pissed off attutude would dissapear. ??? My divorce decree spells it out quite clearly. The only thing that I dislike about it is something that *I*, stupidly, insisted on putting in (a minimum child support amount - at the time, I was not considering that I might hit a Depression, and wind up unemployed for a length of time, as I did a couple of years ago). > mark
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!radian!markbrReferences:
<k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: fea40,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gidfea40,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,92d47cd4838634cf X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-18 17:13:34 PST Newsgroups: bc.general,alt.child-support,can.politics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!radian!markbr From: markbr%radian@natinst.com (mark) Subject: Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program Sender: usenet@radian.uucp (Usenet login for mail routing) Message-ID: <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp> Date: Tue, 18 May 1993 17:45:43 GMT References: <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: zippy.radian.com Organization: n.o.y.b Lines: 45