🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bc.general
Article #63887

Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program

#63887
From: mark
Date: Tue, 18 May 1993 17:45
44 lines
3149 bytes
In article <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu> yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) writes:
>In article <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> lisa@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca writes:
>>Well, the taxpayer-funded, privately operated FMEP did it again.
><snip>
>>FMEP o advise me of when those funds were returned to him.  They then informed
>>me that as I was no longer enrolled with them, they would not give me that
>>information.  They are aware of the fact that my court proceedings concerning
>>the matter of child support arrears will resume this Monday.  In other words,
>>my ex has copies of the chequestubs reflecting the garnishees - and therefore,
>>indicating payments towards arrears -- while I have nothing to show that those
>>funds were subsequently returned to him by the FMEP.
<snip>>
<I'm still not sure what the post below has to do with the one above, but...>
>	You know, *I* have never been "given" anything.  I support
>	myself (and several hundred others).  and my wife is from the
>	same "school".
>
>	I don't think that anyone wants to receive public assisitance
>	of any kind;  it's degrading.
>
>	But there are people who have nothing better to do with their
>	time than graze around looking for "free stuff".  Things they

??? Are you saying that there are people who *do* want to receive public 
assistance, as opposed to the sentence above?

>	can coolect on to better their own lot, rather than just
>	living and working like everyone else.  It's the basis
>	for our "sue crazed" society, and 90% of the lawyer commercials
>	we see on TV.
That I'll agree with."I ain't responsible, it's *gotta* be someone else's fault.
<snip>
>	And if I could make a loud, clear, crisp, affirmative
>	statement to this whole net, if I could know EXACTLY
>	how much I was required to pay for HOW LONG, then
>	at least half of my aggressive pissed off attutude would dissapear.

??? My divorce decree spells it out quite clearly. The only thing that I
dislike about it is something that *I*, stupidly, insisted on putting in
(a minimum child support amount - at the time, I was not considering that
I might hit a Depression, and wind up unemployed for a length of time, as
I did a couple of years ago).
>
	mark
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!radian!markbr
References: <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,92d47cd4838634cf
X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public
X-Google-Thread: fea40,92d47cd4838634cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidfea40,public
X-Google-Thread: fb374,92d47cd4838634cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-18 17:13:34 PST
Newsgroups: bc.general,alt.child-support,can.politics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!radian!markbr
From: markbr%radian@natinst.com (mark)
Subject: Re: Family Maintenance Enforcement Program
Sender: usenet@radian.uucp (Usenet login for mail routing)
Message-ID: <1993May18.174543.4799@radian.uucp>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1993 17:45:43 GMT
References: <k3HJ4B1w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca> <1993May15.150616.759@ll.mit.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: zippy.radian.com
Organization: n.o.y.b
Lines: 45