Article View: bc.general
Article #774Be wary of those who say there is no Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Canada
From: Semper Liber
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:04
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:04
93 lines
5834 bytes
5834 bytes
Those who say there was/is no right to keep and bear arms in Canada fall into one or more of the following catagories..... Supporters of government fascism or similar tyranny... Criminals who fear their victim may be armed Those who confuse RIGHTS with Privileges. "To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding." -- Jeff Snyder, Oct 20, 1994 Our right to keep and bear arms in our own or the country's defense comes from exactly the same place as the American one -- English Common Law, the English Bill of Rights 1689, the writings of Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries on English Law, and others. All these laws (and indeed the full body of English Law), became part of Canadian law on our Confederation in 1867 with the affirmation of the British North America (BNA) Act. http://www.rkba.ca/ _______________________________________________________________ Here is why criminals don't support the right to self defence with firearms...... FBI Uniform Crime Report (1992) shows that 70% of violent crimes are committed by 7% of criminals, many of whom are on probation or are given parole and released early. Of incarcerated felons surveyed by the Department of Justice, 34% have been driven away, wounded, or captured by armed citizens; 40% state that they have decided against committing crimes for fear their would-be victims were armed. The FBI's statistics in the 1992 Uniform Crime Report also concluded: "Violent crime rates are highest overall in states with laws limiting or prohibiting the carrying of concealed firearms for self-defense." [1] "The FBI's data also show that in 20 other states that issue CCW permits (including Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Tennessee, Wyoming, and others), these states have enjoyed a REDUCTION in crime as follows: 1) Violent crime rates are LOWER by 21%. 2) Homicide rates are LOWER by 33% 3) Robbery rates are LOWER by 37% and 4) Aggravated assaults are lower by 13%."[2] States offer selective reciprocity in this area. That is, a permit-holder in one state may be able to carry or transport a weapon in other states with a reciprocity agreement with the home state. Reciprocity does impose on the permit-holder the responsibility for knowing and understanding the differences in the laws between the states. In 39 of the US states, issuing officials may not arbitrarily deny a permit application, a practice known as Florida-style "shall issue." A further eight states have "may issue" laws; typically specific "need" must be established, but in practice, this is often a mechanism to prohibit most people from carrying. These "may issue" states range from "shall issue" in practice (Alabama and Connecticut are examples) to "at the whim of local officials" (such as New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and California; rural officials in those states liberally issue permits but officials in urbanized counties generally are more restrictive) to "almost non-issue" in states such as Maryland where even documented death threats are sometimes not sufficient to convince officials to issue permits and to "never-issue" Hawaii, where permits are never issued under any circumstances. Two states, (Vermont and Alaska), allow any non-felon who has reached the age of 16 or 21 respectively, to carry without a permit of any kind. However, Alaska residents may still obtain a completely optional, non-required permit so as to receive reciprocal carry rights in other states, or to gain exemption from the NICS background check. As of 2006, only two US States-Wisconsin and Illinois-have no provision whatsoever that would allow for the legal concealed carry of firearms by "ordinary" citizens. There are currently movements in each of these states to pass concealed-carry laws; legislation was passed in 2004 and again in 2005, but vetoed by the respective governors. It is expected that Wisconsin will have a signed Concealed Carry law by the end of 2007. The Kansas legislature over-rode the governor's veto to pass CCW on March 23rd, 2006.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7eMlg.60603$771.59582@edtnps89>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps89.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,13025572c0f1e9af,start X-Google-Thread: 113d91,13025572c0f1e9af,start X-Google-Thread: fb374,13025572c0f1e9af,start X-Google-Thread: 1062a0,13025572c0f1e9af,start X-Google-Thread: fb626,13025572c0f1e9af,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,gid113d91,gidfb374,gid1062a0,gidfb626,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps89.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Semper Liber" <nopolicestates??@freedom4�ll.xxx> Newsgroups: bc.general,bc.politics,can.politics,ont.politics,ab.politics Subject: Be wary of those who say there is no Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Canada Lines: 96 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Message-ID: <7eMlg.60603$771.59582@edtnps89> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:04:51 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.81.139.121 X-Trace: edtnps89 1150783491 207.81.139.121 (Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:04:51 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:04:51 MDT