Thread View: bionet.molbio.evolution
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Ana Laura
Wed, 11 May 2011 19:37
RAPD Clades and Types
Author: Ana Laura
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:37
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:37
31 lines
3973 bytes
3973 bytes
--e0cb4e43cd3166f3c304a30535dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi there, I'm starting in RAPD analysis and I've found that it doesn't seem to be any agreement about the best way to measure divesity with this marker. Even worst, if you have decided to use a clustering method or a similarity coefficient, there is still the clade question. When a clade can be called a type? I think it's important since you need to stablish the numbers of types in order to calculate any diversity index. To me, it's cryptic how authors have calculated their values. Any opinion, correction, comment? Thanks. --e0cb4e43cd3166f3c304a30535dd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there,<br><br>I'm starting in RAPD analysis and I've found that = it doesn't seem to be any agreement about the best way to measure dives= ity with this marker. Even worst, if you have decided to use a clustering m= ethod or a similarity coefficient, there is still the clade question. When = a clade can be called a type? I think it's important since you need to = stablish the numbers of types in order to calculate any diversity index. To= me, it's cryptic how authors have calculated their values.<br> <br>Any opinion, correction, comment?<br><br>Thanks.<br> --e0cb4e43cd3166f3c304a30535dd--
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads