🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <34as43$3ni@news.ycc.yale.edu>, una@doliolum.biology.yale.edu
(Una Smith) wrote:

> Note, the Followup-To line is set to bit.admin.
> 
> Is there any interest in moving the newsgroup side of this mailing
> list to the comp.text.* hierarchy?

[...]

> 
> I'd like to propose:                            in place of:
> 
>         comp.text.bibliography.endnote          bit.listserv.endnote
>         comp.text.bibliography.notabene         bit.listserv.notabene

[...]

> 
> Comp.text.* is propagated to about 80% of Usenet, compared to 30% for
> bit.listserv.*.  Newsgroups in comp.text.* include:
> 
>         comp.text.desktop
>         comp.text.frame
>         comp.text.interleaf
>         comp.text.sgml
>         comp.text.tex

Why not
         comp.databases.endnote     ???

Newsgroups in the comp.databases.* hierarchy include

         comp.databases.paradox
         comp.databases.sybase
         comp.databases.xbase.fox

         and many others....

This would seem a more appropriate place for a database program to be discussed.
  ___
   |
 \_|IM
Professor Jim Ratliff
Department of Economics
University of Arizona
Tucson AZ 85721
(602)621-4560/8450[fax]
jratliff@bpa.Arizona.EDU
MIME email welcome