is OBJ_TILE still necessary w/ 2.1 and CM/2 1.0?

Article View: bit.listserv.appc-l

Article #447

Back to bit.listserv.appc-l Previous Next

#447

From: Tom Thomas
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1993 02:49

7 lines
991 bytes

I'm running OS/2 2.1 and CM/2 1.0, but my pubs are older.  I'm not clear
about OBJ_TILE still being required when allocating shared memory for
use in my CPI-C and APPC programs.  The flag works, but do I need it.

Thanks, as always.

Tom Thomas

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9312070249.AA11127@ponder>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU!thomas

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10aed9,d6d429ea0e47379f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aed9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-11 15:33:44 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU!thomas
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.appc-l
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:owner-appc-l@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:thomas@PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU>
Message-ID: <9312070249.AA11127@ponder>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1993 20:49:14 -0600
Sender: APPC Discussion List <APPC-L@AUVM.BITNET>
From: Tom Thomas <thomas@PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU>
Subject: is OBJ_TILE still necessary w/ 2.1 and CM/2 1.0?
Lines: 6