Article View: bit.listserv.appc-l
Article #448CM/2 1.1 and 'dameon' TPs
From: thomas
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 16:54
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 16:54
23 lines
1744 bytes
1744 bytes
I think R. Gray already answered this, but I'd like to confirm
1) In CM/2 1.0, if I have a long-lived (i.e. daemon) TP that does
a) cmaccp()
b) cmrecv()/cmsend() until deallocate
c) go to (a)
...I end up with multiple instances of the TP running, from CMs
perspective (only the last of which has conversations going). Over
time, I end up with a multitude of 'orphan' TPs.
2) Does (1) change in CM/2 1.1?
3) If (2) is 'no', what should I do?
Thanks, as always - Tom Thomas
| Tom S. Thomas | |
| Burlington Northern Railroad | E-mail: thomas@galileo.ftw.bnr.com |
| 600 Continental Plaza | Voice: (817) 333-7945 |
| 777 Main Street | FAX: (817) 333-7833 |
| Ft. Worth, TX 76102 | |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9312151700.AA0170@galileo.ftw.bnr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!zib-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!GALILEO.FTW.BNR.COM!thomasShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10aed9,a32d4dd1c4d7613b,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10aed9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-15 09:28:31 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!zib-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!GALILEO.FTW.BNR.COM!thomas Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.appc-l Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:owner-appc-l@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU> Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:thomas@GALILEO.FTW.BNR.COM> Return-Path: <thomas@galileo.ftw.bnr.com> Message-ID: <9312151700.AA0170@galileo.ftw.bnr.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 10:54:30 CST Reply-To: thomas@galileo.ftw.bnr.com Sender: APPC Discussion List <APPC-L@AUVM.BITNET> From: thomas@GALILEO.FTW.BNR.COM Subject: CM/2 1.1 and 'dameon' TPs Lines: 22