Re: Fluorescence quantification

Article View: bit.listserv.confocal

Article #126

Back to bit.listserv.confocal Previous Next

#126

From: Thomas Radtke
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:00

10 lines
1021 bytes

Allow me the additional remark that you should not quantify the DNA by DAPI
staining anyway because
of the unequalty of AT and GC staining.

bye,

Thomas Radtke

--
http://www.freenet.de/radtke

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3950A470.242E3001@freenet.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<Pine.SOL.4.10.10006141815190.15594-100000@srv1.mail.uni-kiel.de> <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006150943130.10829-100000@hgins.uia.ac.be>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114d69,b2400f47d4c52d86
X-Google-Attributes: gid114d69,public
From: Thomas Radtke <thradtke@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: Fluorescence quantification
Date: 2000/06/21
Message-ID: <3950A470.242E3001@freenet.de>
X-Deja-AN: 637172195
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10006141815190.15594-100000@srv1.mail.uni-kiel.de> <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006150943130.10829-100000@hgins.uia.ac.be>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@rz.uni-jena.de
X-Trace: fsuj19.rz.uni-jena.de 961586302 2696 193.174.234.69 (21 Jun 2000 11:18:22 GMT)
Organization: Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Jun 2000 11:18:22 GMT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.confocal

Reply to Parent Message