Article View: bit.listserv.confocal
Article #43Losing GFP Signal
From: Goodhouse, Joseph
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00
42 lines
3077 bytes
3077 bytes
We have been employing GFP in confocal imaging here for a number of years in a wide variety of specimens ( fly embryos, yeast and bacterial cells and a wide variety of mammalian cells). It is a wonderful fluorescent tag for tracing gene expression and molecular transport, and cell shape changes just to mention a few of its uses. But it does and can have problems in any system from over expression, under expression, bleaching and leaching. So I thought I would pass on a few tips about its use for people who are just beginning to employ it in their work. GFP fluorescence is killed by dehydrating or fixation agents of ethanol and acetone. Its signal is also greatly reduced by formaldehyde fixation. Long term storage of samples in aldehydes will wipe it right out. This will also increase autofluorescence. This type of storage is not wise in regards to maintaining antigenicity of many proteins etc. If you are looking for GFP signal in specimens Employ freezing and cryosectioning instead of fixation of tissues and embryos etc. If you are unable to do this then it requires that you probe with an anti-GFP antibody. The best direct imaging of GFP is obtained in living tissue and cells. For fixation employ low percentage paraformaldehyde for the shortest periods of fixation as possible( 5- 10 minutes for cells). Samples should be mounted in glycerol based mounting medium. I have found 90% buffered glycerol to be best. Avoid using nail polish as sealant of coverslips. In a short time this will wipe out your GFP signal. Also if your GFP is not a fusion protein that gets fixed in place, you will lose all signal upon any permeabilization by detergents and freeze thawing. For imaging in living cells and embryo's use the least exposure times you can get away with as continued exposure can rapidly bleach your GFP. The addition of super radical scavengers in cell cultures systems is a good idea to help slowing of bleach rate. This can be an advantage if you are looking at return of expression. Good luck. Joe Goodhouse Confocal / EM Core Laboratory Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University jgoodhouse@molbio.princeton.edu <mailto:Jgoodhouse@molbio.princeton.edu> 609-258-5432 Visit us at: http://www.molbio.princeton.edu/facility/confocal/index.html <http://www.molbio.princeton.edu/facility/confocal/index.html>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<95D95E662CB7D3119F4900500412F1FE0966A2@molbio.Princeton.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114d69,749bfdf8a9db2a6b,start X-Google-Attributes: gid114d69,public From: "Goodhouse, Joseph" <jgoodhouse@MOLBIO.PRINCETON.EDU> Subject: Losing GFP Signal Date: 2000/03/10 Message-ID: <95D95E662CB7D3119F4900500412F1FE0966A2@molbio.Princeton.EDU> X-Deja-AN: 595741106 Sender: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Trace: 10 Mar 2000 11:32:43 -0500, 127.0.0.1 X-Gateway-From: add_from_switch_to_drobot MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.confocal