Re: Double label florescence

Article View: bit.listserv.confocal

Article #7733

Back to bit.listserv.confocal Previous Next

#7733

From: Katherine Graubard
Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 00:00

12 lines
1050 bytes

Texas Red and FITC works well for us.

On Sat, 27 May 1995, Jack J Swanson wrote:
> I was wondering what you folks thought produed the best double label
> florescence for colocalization studies.  I tried TRITC and FITC and
> thought we had a little bleeding through.  Any other suggestions ???

Katherine Graubard, Ph.D.
University of Washington
Department of Zoology, Box 351800
Seattle, WA 98195-1800
email: graubard@stein.u.washington.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91j.950527131730.15473A-100000@stein2.u.washington.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114d69,907ce7b26a228ae2
X-Google-Attributes: gid114d69,public
From: Katherine Graubard <graubard@STEIN.U.WASHINGTON.EDU>
Subject: Re: Double label florescence
Date: 1995/05/27
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91j.950527131730.15473A-100000@stein2.u.washington.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 103389993
sender: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
x-sender: graubard@stein2.u.washington.edu
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: bit.listserv.confocal