Article View: bit.listserv.confocal
Article #7736Re: Double label florescence
From: Milton Charlton
Date: Sun, 28 May 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 28 May 1995 00:00
18 lines
1407 bytes
1407 bytes
We found Bodipy was a little better than FITC for co-labelling with Texas Red. There is less bleed into the red filter with Bodipy. This using standard Biorad 600 Ar-ion laser at 514nm. When bleed can not be defeated, take advantage of the differntial bleaching rate of Texas red and Bodipy/FITC. We published a graph of differntial bleaching with a real double labelled specimaec in Neuron, 5, pg 773-779, 1990. " Strategic location of calcium channels at transmi tter release sites of frog neuromuscular junction". The differential bleaching allow ed us to determine that bleed of the green signal through the red filter was not a problem. Using zoom we bleached a small box then zoomed out and took another picture. We could see the green bleached out in the box but intact elsewhere. The Texas Red stain o Ca channels was not affected in the area where green had been bleached out. Milton Charlton University of Toronto
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9505281540.AA16033@spine.med.utoronto.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114d69,907ce7b26a228ae2 X-Google-Attributes: gid114d69,public From: Milton Charlton <milton@SPINE.MED.UTORONTO.CA> Subject: Re: Double label florescence Date: 1995/05/28 Message-ID: <9505281540.AA16033@spine.med.utoronto.ca> X-Deja-AN: 103430295 sender: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU> comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU newsgroups: bit.listserv.confocal