Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #267Re: EndNote/WordPerfect 3.1
From: G.J. Rademaker
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 12:14
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 12:14
39 lines
2623 bytes
2623 bytes
In article <199411182255.OAA21749@well.sf.ca.us>, Kimberly Mattingly/Technical Support <nilesinc@WELL.SF.CA.US> wrote: > >Having heard so much trashing of Word 6.0 (Mac), I am considering swithing > >to WordPerfect. But, the integration of EndNote and Word (5.1a) is so > >smooth and useful that I am in a quandry. I understand that one cannot > >place references in WordPerfect footnotes directly (as one can in Word). I > >am willing to give up the EndNote module but not the placement into > >footnotes (without the current, as I understand it, workaround of placing > >it in the body then moving after formatting). > > > >Would any WordPerfect 3.1 users comment on their useage of EndNote? Also, > >would Niles say something about the integration of EndNote and WordPerfect > >(or Nisus or Fullwrite)? I suspect I am not alone among Word users not > >eager to move to 6.0. > > EndNote Plus 2 is compatible with the latest versions of WordPerfect (3.0 > and 3.1), however, there is no Plug-In Module available for WordPerfect. > WordPerfect does not provide all of the technology that we need to implement > a true Plug-In Module like the one we developed for Word 5/5.1. Currently, > there are no plans to develop a Plug-In Module for WordPerfect, but this > could change over time. I will add all your suggestions to our list of > feature requests. > > Thank you, > Kimberly Mattingly > EndNote Technical Support > Is support for FullWrite 2.0 on the way? The developer (Akimbo) claims to have an architecture with extensions, which should make it easy (mind I am not a programmer ;) ) to integrate EN+ into it. At the moment this is the main reason for me NOT to go back to FullWrite (I used to love it, with all its features, only now filtering in into other packages). Thank you in advance, Geert Jan -- G.J. Rademaker <My views, not my employers...> Utrecht University/Mass Spectrometry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gjr-2011941314060001@ana233.chem.ruu.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!ruu.nl!ana233.chem.ruu.nl!userReferences:
<199411182255.OAA21749@well.sf.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,f992913d36cb2bf2 X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-20 04:14:06 PST Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!ruu.nl!ana233.chem.ruu.nl!user From: gjr@ams.chem.ruu.nl (G.J. Rademaker) Subject: Re: EndNote/WordPerfect 3.1 Message-ID: <gjr-2011941314060001@ana233.chem.ruu.nl> Sender: usenet@cc.ruu.nl Organization: Utrecht University References: <199411182255.OAA21749@well.sf.ca.us> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 12:14:06 GMT Lines: 39