🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #267

Re: EndNote/WordPerfect 3.1

#267
From: G.J. Rademaker
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 12:14
39 lines
2623 bytes
In article <199411182255.OAA21749@well.sf.ca.us>, Kimberly
Mattingly/Technical Support <nilesinc@WELL.SF.CA.US> wrote:

> >Having heard so much trashing of Word 6.0 (Mac), I am considering swithing
> >to WordPerfect. But, the integration of EndNote and Word (5.1a) is so
> >smooth and useful that I am in a quandry. I understand that one cannot
> >place references in WordPerfect footnotes directly (as one can in Word). I
> >am willing to give up the EndNote module but not the placement into
> >footnotes (without the current, as I understand it, workaround of placing
> >it in the body then moving after formatting).
> >
> >Would any WordPerfect 3.1 users comment on their useage of EndNote? Also,
> >would Niles say something about the integration of EndNote and WordPerfect
> >(or Nisus or Fullwrite)? I suspect I am not alone among Word users not
> >eager to move to 6.0.
> 
> EndNote Plus 2 is compatible with the latest versions of WordPerfect (3.0
> and 3.1), however, there is no Plug-In Module available for WordPerfect.
> WordPerfect does not provide all of the technology that we need to implement
> a true Plug-In Module like the one we developed for Word 5/5.1. Currently,
> there are no plans to develop a Plug-In Module for WordPerfect, but this
> could change over time. I will add all your suggestions to our list of
> feature requests.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kimberly Mattingly
> EndNote Technical Support
> 
Is support for FullWrite 2.0 on the way? The developer (Akimbo) claims to
have an architecture with extensions, which should make it easy (mind I am
not a programmer ;) ) to integrate EN+ into it. At the moment this is the
main reason for me NOT to go back to FullWrite (I used to love it, with
all its features, only now filtering in into other packages).

Thank you in advance,  Geert Jan

-- 
G.J. Rademaker                       <My views, not my employers...>
Utrecht University/Mass Spectrometry
Technical Details
Message-ID: <gjr-2011941314060001@ana233.chem.ruu.nl>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!ruu.nl!ana233.chem.ruu.nl!user
References: <199411182255.OAA21749@well.sf.ca.us>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,f992913d36cb2bf2
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-20 04:14:06 PST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!ruu.nl!ana233.chem.ruu.nl!user
From: gjr@ams.chem.ruu.nl (G.J. Rademaker)
Subject: Re: EndNote/WordPerfect 3.1
Message-ID: <gjr-2011941314060001@ana233.chem.ruu.nl>
Sender: usenet@cc.ruu.nl
Organization: Utrecht University
References: <199411182255.OAA21749@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 1994 12:14:06 GMT
Lines: 39