🚀 go-pugleaf

R. Larkin wrote:

>   My upgrade offer limits the number of upgrades I can buy at the
>"special" price to one/customer.  Because I and the people who work for me
>use 2 Macs in the office and one at home, I have purchased 3 copies of
>EN+.  I have also provided a lot of advice to prospective customers
>wanting to purchase a bibliographic product.  The limit in the "special"
>price, in effect, penalizes customers like me who wanted to be
>scrupulously honest and buy a copy of EN+ for every machine.  Perhaps
>Niles should expect other users   who own multiple copies to pay less
>attention to the copyright notice in their manuals than if they had been
>treated the same as customers who bought only 1 copy of EN+.

Hopefully, you spoke to soon. I just got a second upgrade offer in the
mail, about a week after to first. If Niles is being reasonable, this
should correspond to the second of the two licenses I own. So I've mailed
it back with my money to up-grade the copy the students use in my lab. I
mailed the first one back last week. I'm expecting to get two upgrades and
no hassles. Several other software upgrades have gone this way recently.
But I agree, the flier definately reads as if it was to be interpreted as
one upgrade per "person."

P. Tratnyek, Oregon Graduate Institute