Re: VMBackup/E catalog disk

Article View: bit.listserv.l-vmctr

Article #669

Back to bit.listserv.l-vmctr Previous Next

#669

From: Schmidt, Ulrike
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1993 14:45

10 lines
1427 bytes

When we upgraded from VMBACKUP 5.3 to VMBACKUP/E we recognized the
same degradation in usage of the catalog disk.
But I can tell you following:
1. till Jan92 with VMBACKUP 5.2 we used 60% of about 800 cyl 3380
2. from Jan92 to Apr92 with VMBACKUP 5.3 the utilization grows to 95%
3. in Apr92 we went to VMBACKUP/E and within the next 6 weeks the
   utilization goes down to normal level of 60%
As far as I remember there was a note within the upgrade information
that this is a fixed problem.
Ulrike Schmidt

Technical Details

Message-ID: <L-VMCTR%93021709565690@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!bcm!convex!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DJUKFA11.BITNET!ZDV045

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe320,ed579e8bd2a4b140
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe320,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-17 06:45:31 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!bcm!convex!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DJUKFA11.BITNET!ZDV045
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Return-Path: <@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU:ZDV045@DJUKFA11.BITNET>
Message-ID: <L-VMCTR%93021709565690@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Date:         Wed, 17 Feb 1993 15:45:31 +0100
Sender:       VMCENTER Components Discussion List <L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET>
From:         "Schmidt, Ulrike" <ZDV045@DJUKFA11.BITNET>
Organization: Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
Subject:      Re: VMBackup/E catalog disk
In-Reply-To:  Message of Tue,
              16 Feb 1993 12:07:53 CST from <BHUNTER@UA1VM.UA.EDU>
Lines: 10