Article View: bit.listserv.nettrain
Article #321Re: Evaluating Internet Resources
From: JQ Johnson
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 00:00
45 lines
3681 bytes
3681 bytes
"Theresa S. Arndt" <tarndt@NETSERV.UNMC.EDU> writes: > I teach source as one of the major criteria for evaluating information > (web-based or otherwise). Domain name is one clue to source. Thus I > believe it is quite relevant. Notice I said ONE clue to source. Source > can be especially confusing on the web. Perhaps the single most important lesson that we can teach to novices is that the web has profoundly democratized the distribution of information. A small company can produce an attractive web site that (except sometimes for the name recognition/trademark value in the URL) competes very well with that of a large company; the multiple orders of magnitude in cost difference between an ad in the local paper and in a national magazine don't apply in THIS medium. An individual who 30 years ago might post a few mimeographed handbills can now get her message out to a worldwide audience. A "C" student can post a term paper from a freshman biology course that is almost indistinguishable in form and URL from the tech report posted by his professor. Source IS confusing on the web, but we are probably better off if we treat this (in lesson 1, at least) as a strength of the medium. As others have noted, I don't find domain name to be at all reliable as a quality indicator, though it's sometimes useful as a partial indicator of type of source and often useful as a way to narrow searches. But if you teach that to novices, be sure to also give them some examples of quality differences within a particular type of domain. And be sure to point out that quality of presentation (e.g. graphical appearance of the web page) is also a poor indicator of source in most domains [aside: graphical appearance is of course a good indicator if you're looking for pages about graphical technique in web page construction :-)] I do think that we should teach URL decomposition and tools for author identification. For example, understanding that it costs a few hundred dollars to get your own domain helps us understand the difference between <http://www.foo.net/bar> and <http://www.bar.org>. Teach the understanding that given <http://fu.baz.edu/long/name> you can try <http://fu.baz.edu/long/>, <http://foo.baz.edu>, or <http://www.baz.edu> to learn about the organizational context. Teach the use of whois to find out a bit about that obscure domain name. Teach use of search engines not just to find a page but to find out more about the putative author of a page you're interested in. Etc. JQ Johnson office: 115F Knight Library Academic Education Coordinator mailto:jqj@darkwing.uoregon.edu 1299 University of Oregon phone: 541-346-1746 (v) -3485 (fax) Eugene, OR 97403-1299 http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~jqj/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<60302901.3117941543@cisco-ts12-line15.uoregon.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<199810210404.VAA16745@darkwing.uoregon.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10449f,cbbf974d4443e6cc,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10449f,public From: JQ Johnson <jqj@DARKWING.UOREGON.EDU> Subject: Re: Evaluating Internet Resources Date: 1998/10/21 Message-ID: <60302901.3117941543@cisco-ts12-line15.uoregon.edu> X-Deja-AN: 403643629 Sender: Internet/BITNET Network Trainers <NETTRAIN@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * References: <199810210404.VAA16745@darkwing.uoregon.edu> Comments: ******************************************************** Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Originator-Info: login-id=jqj; server=darkwing.uoregon.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: JQ Johnson <jqj@DARKWING.UOREGON.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nettrain Content-Disposition: inline