Thread View: bit.listserv.nettrain
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Gill, Kathy
Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
Re: web use/response time
Author: Gill, Kathy
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
70 lines
2812 bytes
2812 bytes
Hi, JQ: > From: JQ Johnson[SMTP:jqj@DARKWING.UOREGON.EDU] > > Kathy Gill quotes Nielsen: > > > The 15-second guideline in the previous paragraph was derived from the > > basic set of response time values that have been known since around > 1968. > > System response needs to happen within about 10 seconds to keep the > user's > > attention > > I did some human factors work in the mid 70s and looked closely at that > research at the time (it was still fairly new then!). The results were > all > over the map even then. > I hope I didn't imply that the paper was definitive -- it was the only one I found doing a quick search. I think the more important issue is of Feedback and predictability (your point). The feedback mechanism is now built into Windows/Mac interface with the "clock" that ticks away while you wait for something to happen. We don't have that on the web (yet). > What would you think of a guideline that required that web pages load in > 3s? Not very practical given current techology. > I agree that's not practical -- didn't I adhere to my "hold your breath" test in my note. <smile> > What the acceptable response time is for web sites remains an open and > interesting question. > > I asked Keith Instone, who maintains the Usable Web site (http://www.usableweb.com/) if he knew of any studies off the top of his head that looked at this issue. He said 'no' (he's also list mom for the ACM CHI-Web list). He does have a "speed" section, http://usableweb.com/items/speed.html . Primarily reports opinions/articles not research, though, except for this one from CHI 97: Internet Delay Effects: How Users Perceive Quality, Organization, and Ease of Use of Information http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/short-talk/als2.htm It shows a definite correlation between "negative perception" and long wait times [mean: 6750 msec] for pages to load compared to short wait times [mean: 575 msec]. Note, this was 1997. And AnchorDesk (also 1997) Avoid Number 1 Web Site Sin: Slow Loading Pages http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_1244.html Kathy
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads