🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: bit.listserv.nettrain
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Gill, Kathy Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
Re: web use/response time
#195
Author: Gill, Kathy
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
70 lines
2812 bytes
Hi, JQ:


> From:         JQ Johnson[SMTP:jqj@DARKWING.UOREGON.EDU]
>
> Kathy Gill quotes Nielsen:
>
> > The 15-second guideline in the previous paragraph was derived from the
> > basic set of response time values that have been known since around
> 1968.
> > System response needs to happen within about 10 seconds to keep the
> user's
> > attention
>
> I did some human factors work in the mid 70s and looked closely at that
> research at the time (it was still fairly new then!).  The results were
> all
> over the map even then.
>
I hope I didn't imply that the paper was definitive -- it was the only one I
found doing a quick search.

I think the more important issue is of Feedback and predictability (your
point). The feedback mechanism is now built into Windows/Mac interface with
the "clock" that ticks away while you wait for something to happen. We don't
have that on the web (yet).





> What would you think of a guideline that required that web pages load in
> 3s?  Not very practical given current techology.
>
I agree that's not practical -- didn't I adhere to my "hold your breath"
test in my note. <smile>



> What the acceptable response time is for web sites remains an open and
> interesting question.
>
>
I asked Keith Instone, who maintains the Usable Web site
(http://www.usableweb.com/) if he knew of any studies off the top of his
head that looked at this issue. He said 'no' (he's also list mom for the ACM
CHI-Web list).

He does have a "speed" section, http://usableweb.com/items/speed.html .
Primarily reports opinions/articles not research, though, except for this
one from CHI 97:

Internet Delay Effects: How Users Perceive
Quality, Organization, and Ease of Use of Information
http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/short-talk/als2.htm

It shows a definite correlation between "negative perception" and long wait
times [mean: 6750 msec] for pages to load compared to short wait times
[mean: 575 msec].

Note, this was 1997.


And AnchorDesk (also 1997)
Avoid Number 1 Web Site Sin: Slow Loading Pages
http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_1244.html



Kathy
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads