Article View: bit.listserv.pchealth
Article #3Re: Microsoft Natural Keyboards
From: Josh Carter
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:00
23 lines
1338 bytes
1338 bytes
Hi Kyle, Kyle Wenda writes: > I would be intrested to find out the real benifits of the Microsoft > Natural Keyboard and it's competitors. Is one any better than the > other? Would a Gel-Eez wrist pad provide the same benifits? > Thanks for your help. I haven't used the MS Natural keyboard for any decent length of time (I didn't think it would help much), but I have found a keyboard which I really like: I've been using a Kinesis Ergonomic Keyboard (Model 130) for the past 1.5 years, and it's really fantastic. It costs more than the MS keyboard, but is worth every penny. I wrote a web page discussing my experiences with the Kinesis, so for more info check out: http://www.spies.com/~josh/kinesis.html Best regards, Josh (p.s. I don't work for Kinesis or anything; just a happy customer.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19970331200553.AAA18591@magic-1010.macip.genmagic.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111621,9d1ffb9f22bb1738 X-Google-Attributes: gid111621,public From: Josh Carter <josh@GENMAGIC.COM> Subject: Re: Microsoft Natural Keyboards Date: 1997/03/31 Message-ID: <19970331200553.AAA18591@magic-1010.macip.genmagic.com> X-Deja-AN: 229726430 Sender: PCHealth -- The Health Effects of Computer Use Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: kinnaman@EMISSARY.NET Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pchealth