Re: Non-Critical vs. Critical Quality Characteristics (CQC)

Article View: bit.listserv.quality

Article #125

Back to bit.listserv.quality Previous Next

#125

From: GrantBlair
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 00:00

14 lines
1444 bytes

In a message dated 12/19/98 3:22:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
rmjdme@connix.com writes:

<< Is there a formal, published methodology which helps to segregate
 Critical Quality Characterisitics (CQC) from non-critical so that
 companies and practicioners can concentrate their limited resources in
 the most productive areas? >>
There are a nuber of methods.
One well-known method is FMEA, which is used by the automotive industry.
Another method, Integrated Process Management, uses KIV (Key input variables)
and KOV (Key Output Variables).

Grantblair@aol.com
Ninety Six SC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <d46205b9.367c1cec@aol.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1159be,c7c2fc3aa1b740d7
X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public
From: GrantBlair@aol.com
Subject: Re: Non-Critical vs. Critical Quality Characteristics (CQC)
Date: 1998/12/21
Message-ID: <d46205b9.367c1cec@aol.com>
X-Deja-AN: 424516263
Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU                              *
Comments: ********************************************************
Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Received: from GrantBlair@aol.com by imo23.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id DBTKa23531; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 16:38:52 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality