Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #13472Re: PAY FOR ?
From: Chris Hutcheson
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 1994 18:56
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 1994 18:56
25 lines
2512 bytes
2512 bytes
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- >----------------------------Original message---------------------------- >I think Beverly is right about a sample of young students being biased >in favor of merit pay as compared to older students. I too once >expected to be a millionaire. An interesting question is whether a >changeover occurs in attitudes toward merit pay, and at what point in >individual development on the job it takes place. RESPONSE: One factor I've found in discussing merit pay or pay-for-performance is, that apart from the risk of bias or subjective evaluation, the dollars usually provided in corporate merit programs usually aren't perceived as enough to motivate employees to perform for merit increases. In Canada, merit increases for high performance seem to fall into the 3 - 5% range in industries I've been associated with (banking, finance, insurance) which on a $30M salary amounts to about a maximum of $1500 before taxes (less than $30 a week). It's simply seen as not enough to justify the effort or commitment. Work we've done with hospitals indicates that alternative reward and recognition systems can provide better results. Chris Hutcheson IDEA Ltd. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199406091740.NAA18442@noc.tor.hookup.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!paladin.american.edu!auvm!hookup.net!chrishShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1159be,8b9b6912c408d924
X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-09 12:02:10 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!paladin.american.edu!auvm!hookup.net!chrish
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality
Comments: ********************************************************
Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header *
Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the *
Comments: * content is implied. *
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU *
Comments: ********************************************************
X-Sender: chrish@tor.hookup.net (Unverified)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Approved-By: "James W. Reese" <R505040@UNIVSCVM.BITNET>
Message-ID: <199406091740.NAA18442@noc.tor.hookup.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 1994 14:56:08 EDT
Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List
<QUALITY@PUCC.BITNET>
From: Chris Hutcheson <chrish@hookup.net>
Subject: Re: PAY FOR ?
Lines: 24