Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #13537Test Equipment Calibration
From: Darren Kent ext: 461
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 1994 22:17
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 1994 22:17
33 lines
2986 bytes
2986 bytes
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- I have a question about the calibration of test equipment. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. The situation is this: we calibrate all of the test equipment that we use for formal acceptance testing. Most of this equipment we own, but some of it we rent or lease. On the equipment we own, we keep track of what equipment is used on a specific test. So if, when get that piece of equipment re-calibrated, we find that is was out of calibration, we can trace back to the tests we performed and determine how or if they were affected by the out of calibration condition. On the rental and lease equipment, we ask for the equipment to be calibrated before it is sent to us and require certificates of calibration to accompany the equipment. So far so good. But, when we are done with the rental equipment we send it back and if that equipment happened to go out of calibration while we were using it we have no way of finding out. The rental agency does not calibrate the equipment when we return it, they calibrate it when they send it out and only if a customer asks them to. The piece of equipment we used may not get calibrated for a long time or maybe even never again. So we can't just ask them to let us know if it is found to be out of calibration. The only solution we can think of is that we ask for it to be calibrated when they send it to us and then again when they receive it back from us. Obviously this is cost prohibitive. Any ideas? How have other companies dealt with this? Our goal is to meet ISO-9001 and ISO 10012-1, and more importantly reduce our risk of using out of calibration equipment for testing. Thanks Darren Kent Ph: 306-931-3425 Fx: 306-933-1486 Inet: Kent@SEDSystems.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199406062150.AA10136@george.SEDSystems.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SEDSystems.ca!kentShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1159be,8259fd8e044ed7db,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-06 19:04:47 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SEDSystems.ca!kent
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality
Comments: ********************************************************
Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header *
Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the *
Comments: * content is implied. *
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU *
Comments: ********************************************************
Approved-By: "James W. Reese" <R505040@UNIVSCVM.BITNET>
Message-ID: <199406062150.AA10136@george.SEDSystems.ca>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:17:04 EDT
Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List
<QUALITY@PUCC.BITNET>
From: "Darren Kent ext: 461" <kent@SEDSystems.ca>
Subject: Test Equipment Calibration
Lines: 32