Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #13542Re: Test Equipment Calibration
From: Michael Solinas
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 1994 13:04
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 1994 13:04
36 lines
3496 bytes
3496 bytes
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > > I have a question about the calibration of test equipment. Any feedback > > would be greatly appreciated. The situation is this: we calibrate all of > > the test equipment that we use for formal acceptance testing. Most of this > > equipment we own, but some of it we rent or lease. On the equipment we own, > > we keep track of what equipment is used on a specific test. So if, when get > > that piece of equipment re-calibrated, we find that is was out of > > calibration, we can trace back to the tests we performed and determine how o r > > if they were affected by the out of calibration condition. > Interesting approach! I've been dealing with Quality System Audits for > over 17 years and I've never had an auditor request how we trace back an > out of calibration condition to a previously performed test... I thought this was standard! I've been involved in supplying military components for years. Most contracts call out MIL-STD-45662 as a calibration standard - and you are required to be able to do this. > Since you'll NEVER know when the out-of-cal took place (you assume that it > was good when it left the lab), going back to a previously completed test > seems illogical. Do you assume that it was the equipment rather than the > test item? Do you re-test with a "known good" tester to see if a particular > parameter was really in or out? ...and how do you know that the other > piece of equipment was really good?? In our case, we had a calibration failure. We could demonstrate, by reviewing the data sheet, that the error was causing us to test TOO TIGHTLY. So - we may have wasted some good product, but is wasn't necessary to recall and retest. We got very, very lucky. > Larry McElhiney, QE (ISO Coordinator) > Plantronics, Inc. > Santa Cruz, CA How is your ISO certification going? Are you certified? We had our pre- assessment, and will have the assessment the last week of this month.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199406071302.GAA20245@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!netcom.com!msolinasShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1159be,8259fd8e044ed7db
X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-07 06:13:37 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!netcom.com!msolinas
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality
Comments: ********************************************************
Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header *
Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the *
Comments: * content is implied. *
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU *
Comments: ********************************************************
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2014
Approved-By: "James W. Reese" <R505040@UNIVSCVM.BITNET>
Message-ID: <199406071302.GAA20245@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 1994 09:04:24 EDT
Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List
<QUALITY@PUCC.BITNET>
From: Michael Solinas <msolinas@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Test Equipment Calibration
In-Reply-To: <199406071150.EAA04800@mail.netcom.com> from
"sandy47@cats.ucsc.edu" at Jun 7, 94 07:39:20 am
Lines: 35