🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #21

Re: Inspection and test status

#21
From: RNav
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 00:00
38 lines
2444 bytes
In a message dated 9/25/98 19:50:18, you wrote:

<<I am the Quality Manager of ABB Centrum Ltd. in Poland. Scope of my firm
activity include: design engineering, supply, erection supervision,
commissioning, after sales service of automation system for use in power
generation industries.
I  have  the  problem  with Inspection and test status. Our product include
automation  systems used in power generation industry and it is not obvious
how  to  establish  and  implement  the  inspection and test status. To the
computer  system  we  can  not stick the status card. Naturally we test our
products  in  many  ways  and we have a lot of measurements, but in fact, I
feel,  this  is not enough. We maintain the products register which include
all the goods we sold, but I think this is not a good solution.
I count on your help and good advice.



Monika Bryczkowska
Quality Manager
monika.bryczkowska@plcen.mail.abb.com
>>

I'm not sure exactly what your question is, but I think it is you want to know
how to identify the inspection and test status of your product.

Not being familiar with your product or process, this will be generic.  I
assume you have components and completed assemblies.  Per ISO-9000, where ever
you have an inspection and or test in your process, the product in test or
completing test must be identified as to the status of the inspection or test.
For instance, pass, rejected, scrap, rework, repair.  The status determination
and who determines it should be per your procedures.

I hope this helps.

Robert Drensek, CQE, CQA, CRE
Quality Engineer
RNAV@AOL.COM
Technical Details
Message-ID: <cf39da5f.360d5d59@aol.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1159be,6704879cace188e8
X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public
From: RNav@aol.com
Subject: Re: Inspection and test status
Date: 1998/09/26
Message-ID: <cf39da5f.360d5d59@aol.com>
X-Deja-AN: 395653662
Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU                              *
Comments: ********************************************************
Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Received: from RNav@aol.com by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id DBQCa02316; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 17:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality