Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #211QS9000, Chapter 4.11 Dilemma
From: Daniel J O'Leary
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00
43 lines
2910 bytes
2910 bytes
John W. Beemster asked, "Under chapter 4.11 of QS-9000, it states all tools that are used to determine conformance of a product to stated tolerances must be calibrated. This means one must calibrate each steel ruler on our manufacturing floor. This also means tracking, controlling, and dispositioning over three hundred rulers!" This is easy, if you think about it the right way. The problem is that you need a way to know if the steel rule is telling you the truth. It must be easy to use and effective. Don't confusing calibration with recall, adjustment, etc. In the electronics industry we what a similar problem with wrist straps to control electro-static discharge. They must be check frequently to ensure they work, this is analogous to calibration. The common method is to install wrist strap test stations around the plant and have each employee check his/her wrist strap every day. The employee writes the results in a log posted at the station. If the wrist strap is defective, it is replaced and discarded. The wrist strap test stations are in the calibration recall program, not the wrist straps. At audit time, we ask the employee which station they commonly use and check the records for the day they worked. In the steel rule case, do the same thing. I assume these are six inch rules. Set up a a, say, four inch measure station and ask each employee to check the rule daily. If they get the right measurement, they are done. If not, discard the rule and issue a new one. Put the measurement stations in the recall program. Be smart about how you check the rule, so you really find problems. If your employees are allowed to measure from the end, then you should check the end, not start the measurement at 1 inch. You can also use this as a check to make sure that employees know the proper technique. People will think it is a silly quality rule, so try to get some value from it. Dan O'Leary doleary@qbe.picker.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<85256666.005D6879.00@ntssmtp.picker.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,d34d833b6a3269cd X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: "Daniel J O'Leary" <doleary@ntssmtp.picker.com> Subject: QS9000, Chapter 4.11 Dilemma Date: 1998/08/20 Message-ID: <85256666.005D6879.00@ntssmtp.picker.com> X-Deja-AN: 384330523 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Received: by ntssmtp.picker.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.1 (569.2 2-6-1998)) id 85256666.005E3AE1 ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 13:09:14 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: PICKER Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality Content-Disposition: inline