Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #253TQM and Teams
From: Clint Pheeney
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 00:00
23 lines
1661 bytes
1661 bytes
Greetings All! the organisation where I work (15,000+ employees) is trying to introduce teams into the work environment. One of the difficulties (amongst many) I see is that the organisation is traditionally autocratic and militaristic. There are major issues here for managers re controls and accountabilities etc. My view is that teams work best in a 'quality' environment, and to try to implement them in an organisation that is not committed to quality is doomed to failure. In my experience teams are inextricably linked to quality. Whilst quality in the workplace can exist without teams, I do not believe that teams can operate successfully without a commitment by the organisation to quality. I would be interested in peoples observations and/or experiences on this issue. Regards, -- Clint Pheeney clint@unforgettable.com Griffith NSW Australia
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33F64AB9.FDDF216B@unforgettable.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,bcef95615b54a48a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: Clint Pheeney <clint@unforgettable.com> Subject: TQM and Teams Date: 1997/08/16 Message-ID: <33F64AB9.FDDF216B@unforgettable.com> X-Deja-AN: 264662771 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Comments: ******************************************************** X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Received: from aardvark ([203.23.177.200]) by ren.globecomm.net (8.8.7/8.8.0) with ESMTP id UAA19824 for <QUALITY@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU>; Sat, 16 Aug 1997 20:56:20 -0400 (EDT) Approved-By: "Bill Casti, CQA (System Administrator)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality