Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #268Re: Speaking of teams.../G'house
From: L. H. Garlinghouse
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00
39 lines
2497 bytes
2497 bytes
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 16:20:13 -0400 Fred Nickols says: > I'm looking into team compensation for a fellow I know (not a client, by the > way), and the subject of voting on shares in team bonuses has come up. The > idea is something similar to what we've heard goes on in major league > baseball teams with world series money. Does anyone on this list know > anything about that? =========================== I am not up on the particulars of team bonuses per se. However I will throw out that the concept of team conpensation over, above, beyond, in addition to the agreed upon compensation package is probably a very bad idea. If the annual review process is generally felt to be counter productive and destructive, how much more so would a team member review process that impacts compensation be??!! Can you think of a better way to destroy team cohesiveness and mutual trust? (Or a better way to encourage a team to stop searching for truth and start creating disinformation that pays better?) The rule of thumb that a loal early adopter and succesful implementor of all the TQM stuff has is that team rewards should have little salvage value and/or should be consumed within 24h - and I think that should just about cover the subject of team rewards. I would guess ball caps and T-shirts would fit in the "little salvage value" classification. I don't think there is much of a parallel between a profesional sports "team" and an industrial TQM type team and providing compensation as if there were is not sensible at all. << All opinions, statements, &c are my own>> L.H. Garlinghouse, C.Q.E. Pocahontas AR U.S.A. (870) 892-4586 ext 7659 garlinghou@waterlooindustries.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2177D8C3B4E@poca.waterlooindustries.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,21d7b13cbbc89c93,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: "L. H. Garlinghouse" <garlinghou@waterlooindustries.com> Subject: Re: Speaking of teams.../G'house Date: 1997/08/19 Message-ID: <2177D8C3B4E@poca.waterlooindustries.com> X-Deja-AN: 265475498 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Comments: ******************************************************** X-Received: from SpoolDir by WI-POCA (Mercury 1.30); 19 Aug 97 16:07:25 -0600 Priority: normal Approved-By: "Bill Casti, CQA (System Administrator)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Organization: Waterloo Industries, Inc. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality