Article View: bit.listserv.quality
Article #46Re: Attitudes
From: Jay Warner
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 00:00
64 lines
3380 bytes
3380 bytes
Tony Mack wrote: > I would like to respectfully disagree with the moderator. A > discussion > about the attitudes of employees is very pertinent to this list and to > > quality. I have been running quality programs and processes in the > plastic > industry for over 30 years, and never did I make a more positive > improvement in the quallity levels of the organization until I > attacked > attitudinal problems head on. I'll buy into that! > There are several excellent training > programs available that help quality professionals and human resource > personnel train people in the power of positive attitudes (and the > destructive power of negative attitudes) on the quality level of the > products and services being produced. One such program we have used > is > "Increasing Human Effectiveness" by Edge Learning of Tacoma, > Washington. > The course is designed to be given by employees to employees and the > results are nothing short of outstanding. Even after a year, people > who > have taken the course still talk about it and wear their golden > attitude > pin to remind them that a postive attitude is the best thing we can > each > bring into the work place and into our homes to resolve problems, > build > teamwork, and improve processes that otherwise cause major quality > issues > for us and our organization. Please, let this discussion continue - > I > would love to hear from other Quality and HR professionals about > their > experiences with attitude training. But the cynic in me says, most of these programs were aimed at the wrong people - they should have woken up the managers, not tried to make the workers into docile unquestioning automatons. I've expeirenced a number of those courses, sorry. Personal motivation is probably the single most important factor in Q improvement, and one over which everyone claims someone else controls (I include myself as consultant in that, BTW). I'll stop before everyone is ticked at me. Jay -- Jay Warner Principal Scientist Warner Consulting, Inc. 4444 North Green Bay Road Racine, WI 53404-1216 USA Ph: (414) 634-9100 FAX: (414) 681-1133 email: a2q@execpc.com Power to the data!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<718p85$q3o@newsops.execpc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<199810232250_MC2-5DE7-E210@compuserve.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1159be,9528b7432390bb40 X-Google-Attributes: gid1159be,public From: Jay Warner <a2q@execpc.com> Subject: Re: Attitudes Date: 1998/10/29 Message-ID: <718p85$q3o@newsops.execpc.com> X-Deja-AN: 406248527 Sender: TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries Discussion List <QUALITY%PUCC.BITNET@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * References: <199810232250_MC2-5DE7-E210@compuserve.com> Comments: ******************************************************** X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Approved-By: "Bill Casti (System Admin)" <help@QUALITY.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" X-Received: (from news@localhost) by daily-bugle.newsops.execpc.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA26870; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 22:00:05 -0600 (CST) X-Complaints-To: abuse@execpc.com X-Trace: daily-bugle.newsops.execpc.com 909633605 26744 (None) 207.250.155.192 Organization: Warner Consulting, inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: a2q@execpc.com Newsgroups: bit.listserv.quality