🚀 go-pugleaf

Jay Vassos-Libove says:

 Lots of technical stuff on how to BEST implement a relay command
 deleted for the sake of clarity and brevity.....

>
>The only question is, does Valdis have the time and the
>inclination to do it. (Or anyway else, who is capable of
>editing the Relay code).
>
>Am I correct Valdis, that technically it really isn't that
>bad, but (as usual) you're being pulled in too many directions
>to do much that isn't necessary on the code?
>

Other stuff on unreliability of /since, etc.. also deleted.

I would like to point out that this list is not here to FLAME and
insult.  Your comments agree with Valdis in his wish to implement
the new code in a thorough manner (vs. patchworking it in), yet
you turn around and question his commitment to relay (opposed to all
his other work and other commitments at home).

I agree that new code and improvements are nice if they can be
implemented on a timely and complete basis, but I do not agree
that it gives anyone the right to make a personal "COMMENT" in
a public forum such as this.  Next time, send it to him directly.

Before anyone comments on my PUBLIC statement on this, I feel that
the rebuttal needed to be in the same forum as the first.  Normally
I would have responded privately.  If anyone has "constructive"
comments to make, they are welcome on this list.  FLAMES should be
sent privately and kept OFF the list.  Thanks.


Gina Gestautas (Aggieland Asst. MasterOp)

north@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu or north@drycas