Article View: bit.listserv.skywarn
Article #183Re: Last Chicago NWSFO 1100 AM Severe Weather Outlook
From: Robert Hajek
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00
90 lines
4918 bytes
4918 bytes
Matt N9NPP wrote: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 11:55:47 -0500 >Subject: 1100 AM SEVERE WEATHER OUTLOOK = last one for chicago > >WWUS35 KCHI 301554 >SPSCHI >ILZ003>006-008-010>014-019>023-032>033-039-INZ001>002-010>011- >019-011100- > >SEVERE WEATHER OUTLOOK >NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO IL >1054 AM CDT WED SEP 30 1998 > >FOR NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST ILLINOIS AND NORTHWEST INDIANA > >THUNDERSTORMS WILL LIKELY DEVELOP THIS AFTERNOON INTO THIS >EVENING AHEAD OF A COLD FRONT...HOWEVER NO SEVERE >THUNDERSTORMS ARE EXPECTED. > >THIS IS THE LAST ROUTINE ISSUANCE OF THE 1100 AM SEVERE >WEATHER OUTLOOK FOR THIS SEASON. THE DAILY 1100 AM SEVERE >WEATHER OUTLOOK WILL RESUME MARCH 1 1999. SEVERE WEATHER >OUTLOOKS WILL BE ISSUED AS NEEDED FOR MODERATE OR HIGH RISKS >OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28. > >THE DAILY HAZARDOUS WEATHER OUTLOOK WILL CONTINUE TO BE ISSUED >FOR ALL WEATHER HAZARDS THAT EFFECT NORTHERN ILLINOIS AND >NORTHWEST INDIANA YEAR-ROUND AT 600 AM. > >BROWNING > > > >NNNN Although this seems to be a repeat of history, it is not identical. Back in the late 80s/early 90s there was a decision at WSFO CHI to eliminate all the SWOs unless there was a moderate or high risk of severe storms. I was told by one party there that they looked stupid putting out a statement that no severe storms were expected when the weather was nice. And that was the situation in August 1990 on the 28th when the late morning AC escalated to a Moderate Risk (or High-don't recall for sure without looking into the archives) and because it was not a regular process, there was no Chicago SWO issued and since there was none it could only be assumed that there was no real risk. Tell the people in Plainfield IL about that. BUT--- The situation today is NOT identical. First, the Hazardous Weather Outlook is still to be produced early morning and will no doubt include information about severe weather as well as other significant winter weather information. Then the availability of information is different today than in that time period. Telephone company deregulation coupled with increase in data rates on circuits and virtually making everything but the NOAA Weather Wire (NWWS) too expensive, eliminated earlier sources of information (Service A, RAWARC, 604 Circuit). On the NWWS there were no MKC severe weather products except the actual watches until after Plainfield. Troy Kimmel (Austin TX) pushed for the SWO products (DY1 DY2 MCD) and they were added to the NWWS in early 90s. Then I requested that the status reports be added in the mid 90s and they along with the "WIBIS" (Watch Will Be Issued-WWUS40) products were added, so the NWWS has the source info from the SPC. Additionally, many have access to these products from EMWIN. We are fortunate that the NWS has become more open about the availability of products from the 80s. I remember one trip to the Belt Area and John Neilon was touring me around NWS facilities including the the World Weather Bldg Precip group and I mentioned the Excess Rainfall (QPFERD) and Heavy Snowfall (QPFHSD) products were appreciated and he thought that I had committed a sin looking at those products. That stuff is available today. So while it is noted that CHI will eliminate the 11AM product, St Louis and Central IL have noted that they are closing their Svr Wx Outlooks for the season - period (unless "needed" or if there is a risk). Quad Cities will probably continue their Significant Weather Outlook, year 'round, as they have since it was instituted when the new office was turned up. The flavor of the WCM, and the SOO who came from Larry Mooney's shop are apparent. So, Matt, there's a little background to that "announcement". Bob Hajek W9QBH Illinois SEC Asst Director Melrose Park ES/PS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from SKYWARN send e-mail to LISTSERV@PO.UIUC.EDU with "unsub skywarn" in the body of your message. If you need help or more information on the SKYWARN discussion group write to chris@siu.edu or see http://www.inlink.com/~landmb/intro.html. For more information on SKYWARN activities across the country visit http://www.skywarn.com and http://www.winternet.com/~daveej.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13957363DFF7D01192040080D87006CD0204565D@golntxch01.ceco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1048cc,89bdbd619a7289ed,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1048cc,public From: Robert Hajek <Robert.J.Hajek@UCM.COM> Subject: Re: Last Chicago NWSFO 1100 AM Severe Weather Outlook Date: 1998/10/01 Message-ID: <13957363DFF7D01192040080D87006CD0204565D@golntxch01.ceco.com> X-Deja-AN: 397006034 Sender: The SKYWARN list <SKYWARN@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Robert.J.Hajek@UCM.COM Newsgroups: bit.listserv.skywarn