Re: multiserial and point multiserial correlation

Article View: bit.listserv.stat-l

Article #3578

Back to bit.listserv.stat-l Previous Next

#3578

From: Philip Tejera
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1992 16:42

4 lines
925 bytes

Your original posting seems to contain some accidental reversals of
the terms "point biserial" and "biserial", to such a degree as to be
basically worthless. Would you please proofread and correct it, and then
resubmit it? Thanks.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <STAT-L%92012913383555@VM1.MCGILL.CA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!BARUCH.BITNET!TEJERA

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5efb,f714ecadbdebc279
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5efb,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-29 10:51:21 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!BARUCH.BITNET!TEJERA
Message-ID: <STAT-L%92012913383555@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
Date:         Wed, 29 Jan 1992 11:42:15 EST
Sender:       "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET>
From:         Philip Tejera <TEJERA@BARUCH.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: multiserial and point multiserial correlation
In-Reply-To:  Message of Mon, 27 Jan 1992 18:34:13 EST from <EDFJHN@GSUVM1>