Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #123S-R Thinking in PCT?
From: Fred Nickols
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 00:00
30 lines
1606 bytes
1606 bytes
[From Fred Nickols (990502.0642)]-- >Rick Marken (990430.0920)] >>Bruce Gregory (990430.1147 EDT)- > >> This definition seems to imply that the "credible threat of >> force" causes people to behave in certain ways. Interesting... > >Good point. But it is easier than saying " the credible threat >of an insuperable disturbance to a perception the person is >known to be controlling". A question of clarification regarding Rick's reply to Bruce G. A "threat of a disturbance" (insuperable or otherwise) would suggest envisioning or imagining some probable or predicted state of affairs. I've only gotten through Chapter 7 in B:CP yet so forgive the dumb question but are perceptions of probable or predicted future states part of the PCT hierarchy or scheme of things? If so, where and how do they fit in? Where are they discussed in B:CP? -- Regards, Fred Nickols Distance Consulting "Assistance at A Distance" http://home.att.net/~nickols/distance.htm nickols@worldnet.att.net (609) 490-0095
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19990502110647.CUYJ6635@fnickols>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,d94de341c5f87763,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Fred Nickols <nickols@WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Subject: S-R Thinking in PCT? Date: 1999/05/02 Message-ID: <19990502110647.CUYJ6635@fnickols> X-Deja-AN: 473567373 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> X-Sender: nickols@postoffice.worldnet.att.net Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior