Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #34Re: Marketing Non- Coercion
From: Bill Powers
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:00
21 lines
1485 bytes
1485 bytes
[From Bill Powers (990504.1204 MDT)] Tim Carey (990504.2120)-- >I find it so weird to talk about coercion as an "inherent aspect" of systems >in a forum that discusses PCT. Then how about this: If the program I adopt relative to other people calls for me to win every conflict, and use as much force as necessary on other people to get my way, couldn't we call this an inherently coercive approach to other people? Certainly it's possiblo, by some extremely unlikely combination of circumstances, that I would use this approach on another person who just happens to want my effects on him to be exactly what they are, so closely that I can see no error at all to correct, but I don't think that would happen often enough to worry about. We're talking about what it takes to make a person into a bully, aren't we? Weren't you interested in that subject at one time? Best, Bill P.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3.0.6.32.19990504121028.007a2b70@mail.frontier.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,dc753c9528deb80a X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Bill Powers <powers_w@FRONTIER.NET> Subject: Re: Marketing Non- Coercion Date: 1999/05/04 Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990504121028.007a2b70@mail.frontier.net> X-Deja-AN: 474004042 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> X-Sender: powers_w@mail.frontier.net Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior