Article View: bit.sci.purposive-behavior
Article #35Re: technical discussions
From: Bill Powers
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:00
27 lines
1579 bytes
1579 bytes
[From Bill Powers (990504.1135 MDT)] Bob Hintz (990503.2150)-- >Would it be accurate to describe "coercion" in its obvious physical >manifestation as one response to conflict. I see it simply as a special case of conflict, in which one party is so much stronger than the other that he or she always wins. > It may be some people's first >resort and other's last resort, but it is one way to try to end a conflict. ... >Does this seem like what you are saying - I think it is the learning part >that has gotten left out or gone unnoticed in discussions of overwhelming >force or threat. Some people simply never learn what a coercer is teaching, >some simply refuse and may be killed, some escape, and some are successful >at adopting the coercers perspective and become excellent slaves. Yes, I agree about the learning part, and I'd probably work out the rest the same way you do. Best, Bill P.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3.0.6.32.19990504120312.007a2610@mail.frontier.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3.0.6.32.19990503111130.007a2520@mail.frontier.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6c09,ba5ad6155a66ce63 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c09,public From: Bill Powers <powers_w@FRONTIER.NET> Subject: Re: technical discussions Date: 1999/05/04 Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990504120312.007a2610@mail.frontier.net> X-Deja-AN: 474004043 Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSGNET@POSTOFFICE.CSO.UIUC.EDU> References: <3.0.6.32.19990503111130.007a2520@mail.frontier.net> X-Sender: powers_w@mail.frontier.net Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.sci.purposive-behavior