🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #5108

Re: ADO Update failure

#5108
From: Mike Baden
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:48
48 lines
2912 bytes
I talked to Borland technical support (on a different issue) and they
pointed me to the FAQ that answers this question.  I've already gotten the
patch installed by reinstalling BCB5 so I haven't tried this out, but it may
help others that hit the same problem:

Question:

When I attempt to install the ADO Express update, it refuses, indicating
that C++Builder Update 1 has not been installed. I've tried installing and
re-installing Update 1, but the ADO Express Update still will not install.

Answer:

The ADO Express update checks the version of your C++Builder installation
based on the timestamps on the C++Builder executables. If these timestamps
have been changed, the update will not install. To resolve this problem,
first make certain that C++Buidler 5 Update 1 has, indeed, been installed.
Open a command prompt (DOS box) and navigate to your C++Builder 5 Bin
directory. Use the TOUCH.EXE program to change the dates on the Builder
files with this command (without quotes): "touch -t17:01:00 -d07/08/2000
*.exe" and hit <Enter>. This will restamp the execuatble files with the
proper version number. The ADOExpress Update should now install without a
problem.




"Mike Baden" <mikebaden@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3b4baf77$1_1@dnews...
> I've got BCB5 Pro, with ADO Express, and am trying to load the patch
> (BCB5ADOUpgrade1.exe).  It complains that I need to load the BCB5 patch #1
> first, which I've already loaded (several times).  I've seen other
postings
> asking this question -- one response said that reloading BCB5 patch #1
> should allow the ADO patch to load, but that didn't work for me.  Another
> posting said that you need to reinstall BCB5 itself.  I'd really rather
not
> do that -- I've got a lot of 3rd party components, and it takes a couple
> hours or so to reload and rebuild everything.  Please, someone tell me
that
> Borland hasn't let such a stupid bug remain for so long.  Does anyone know
a
> better way around this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Baden
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3b4dd4c2$2_2@dnews>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp-relay.ihug.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!dnews
References: <3b4baf77$1_1@dnews>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10698b,327bc070d5fbdbf2
X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-12 10:03:03 PST
From: "Mike Baden" <mikebaden@mindspring.com>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
References: <3b4baf77$1_1@dnews>
Subject: Re: ADO Update failure
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:48:12 -0400
Lines: 50
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.32.91.216
Message-ID: <3b4dd4c2$2_2@dnews>
X-Trace: dnews 994956482 66.32.91.216 (12 Jul 2001 09:48:02 -0700)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp-relay.ihug.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!dnews