🚀 go-pugleaf

It is possible to use a second RDM but what does it mean for the
number of
connections to the datase and the amount of client-licenses needed?

PIQUOT J�r�me heeft geschreven in bericht
<7pr26e$fjk4@forums.borland.com>...
>dont put all your tables in the same RDM. you surely dont need to
access to
>all the tables in the same client form make a RDM for each treatement
type.
>
>--
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>PIQUOT J�r�me
>A. WOLFF SA
>6, rue de la Gare
>67120 ERNOLSHEIM/BRUCHE
>FRANCE
>e-mail: wolff@media-net.fr
>http://www.media-net.fr/wolff
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Rita van Kalmthout <kalmhout@tref.nl> a �crit dans le message :
>7ppjua$dr610@forums.borland.com...
>> hello,
>>
>> I am a user who is using MIDAS the first time. My biggest question
for
>> now is the Application Server which handles all communication to
the
>> Interbase server.
>> Starting with my Application Server I made a provider for every
table
>> to access. I ran into a problem using more than about 35 providers
>> (giving some strange error-messages). Later on I discovered that
you
>> can do the whole thing by using one provider and using Datarequest
>> event to change SQL (in the client) to get the table you want.
But:
>> is this not more time-consuming than the first method and will it
give
>> me problems when I have a lot of users connecting to the
Application
>> Server (errors)?
>>
>> Please help me on this.
>>
>>
>> Rita van Kalmthout-Hense
>> kalmhout@tref.nl
>>
>> Netherlands
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>