🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi:

Now This is my definition with padding that it�s working well.

unsigned __int8  fNumbeForegin[20];
       char                          PaddingPIN[3] ;

       TSettings fProfileSettings[1];



struct TProfileSettings
{
 __int8    fModeState;
 __int8    fAscendingState;
 __int8    fToneState;
  char    fAudio[14];

  char padding[3];
}

I have proved with alignment Dword and Word, but they don�t work well.

"Bob Gonder" <notbg@notmindspring.invalid> escribi� en el mensaje
news:kb6hmv0pa8o95ursa78l00hjlem1ghsu8q@4ax.com...
> Antonio Farfan wrote:
>
> >Now I solve the problem with the option of compiler of Bytes (Alignment)
but
> >i have to add fields of padding in the struct. This is my problem. This
> >procedure is not very graceful. If there are any change in the Struct i
need
> >to readjust the paddings.You can read my first email.
>
> There are 53 bytes before your problem sub-structure.
> If you need 1 byte of padding, then you need WORD alignment.
> If you need 3, then you need DWORD alignment
>
> TSettings is 17 bytes, so it is going to throw off the alignment for
> alarmRecord also (unless you need WORD alignment).
> Since you haven't mentioned alarmRecord being incorrect, you probably
> need WORD alignment.
> Either
> #pragma option -a2
> or
> #pragma   pack(push,2)
>
>
> If you still can't get it to work,
> Repost just the one structure definition TPS_Settings;
> Show us the "padding" that makes it "work" with byte alignment.
>
>
>