🚀 go-pugleaf

As far as I know, if you use Synchronize() it will lose the Thread effect, 
because it will wait until the main() to process that function.

For some situations you need Synchronize() though. When I was using 2 
Threads and drawing some graphics. For some reasons, the program keeps on 
crashing, even with semaphores, until I use Synchronize(), of course then 
it will be on hold while doing graphic operations, but at least the 
calculation can be done in thread.

HTH
Phuoc Can HUA

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 16:34:45 -0800, Paul E. <paulepst69@aol.com> wrote:

> I've developed an application that must process few function every 1-5
> seconds, unfortunately when I run the application it is very slow and
> dramatically use a lot of the system resources, so I thought of making a
> thread that can handle this time based operation in my application as the
> code below shows, but still the application is very slow and it uses a 
> lot
> of the system resources...can anyone give me any idea on how to speed up 
> the
> process...optimize my thread....and is my code correct or I am missing
> anything...???  thanks all for your help
>
> void __fastcall TIMConnection::Execute()
> {
> while(Terminated==false)
> {
> Synchronize(RUNME1);
> Close();
> }
> }

-- 
_/\__/\__/\__/\__/\__/\_
www.huaonline.com
My Homepage is my Castle