Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #5236Re: process in memory
From: Jonathan Benedicto
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:49
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:49
22 lines
2175 bytes
2175 bytes
"Norm Jaffe" <mail@aurelsystems.com> wrote in message news:432f05fc$1@newsgroups.borland.com... >I just performed an regular batch compile of our project, which has a >moderately large number of files, > on a dual processor system - while watching activity using the task > manager. > It shows that _both_ processors are very active during the 'make'; there > may be 'wasted' cycles, due to Windows XP > taking idle time, but it's not the case that one processor does nothing > while the other is doing compiles. > In fact, they both have the same utilization curves, and peak at the same > times. Are you using mtbcc32, or just plain bcc32 ? > Have you looked at your CPU usage during compiles, either with the IDE or > using batch files? Well, looking at my CPU usage would't be very helpful, as I only have a single chip machine. Jonathan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<432f07d4$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<432a4ce3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432e5ed4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ec891$2@newsgroups.borland.com> <janti1t9p5e1mv6f62e5flrqu6ffh5s5jk@4ax.com> <432ee858$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ef7d7$5@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efb87$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efebb$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f0452$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f05fc$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,81249344387d138e X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Jonathan Benedicto" <incorrect@no.server> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi References: <432a4ce3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432e5ed4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ec891$2@newsgroups.borland.com> <janti1t9p5e1mv6f62e5flrqu6ffh5s5jk@4ax.com> <432ee858$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ef7d7$5@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efb87$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efebb$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f0452$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f05fc$1@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: process in memory Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:21 -0400 Lines: 24 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.158.96.207 Message-ID: <432f07d4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1127155668 69.158.96.207 (19 Sep 2005 11:47:48 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail