Re: process in memory

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi

Article #5237

Back to borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi Previous Next

#5237

From: Norm Jaffe
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:17

27 lines
2398 bytes

I'm using vanilla Borland C++ Builder 6, with up-to-date patches.

"Jonathan Benedicto" <incorrect@no.server> wrote in message 
news:432f07d4$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> "Norm Jaffe" <mail@aurelsystems.com> wrote in message 
> news:432f05fc$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>I just performed an regular batch compile of our project, which has a 
>>moderately large number of files,
>> on a dual processor system - while watching activity using the task 
>> manager.
>> It shows that _both_ processors are very active during the 'make'; there 
>> may be 'wasted' cycles, due to Windows XP
>> taking idle time, but it's not the case that one processor does nothing 
>> while the other is doing compiles.
>> In fact, they both have the same utilization curves, and peak at the same 
>> times.
>
> Are you using mtbcc32, or just plain bcc32 ?
>
>> Have you looked at your CPU usage during compiles, either with the IDE or 
>> using batch files?
>
> Well, looking at my CPU usage would't be very helpful, as I only have a 
> single chip machine.
>
> Jonathan
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <432f0e32$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

References:

<432a4ce3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432e5ed4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ec891$2@newsgroups.borland.com> <janti1t9p5e1mv6f62e5flrqu6ffh5s5jk@4ax.com> <432ee858$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ef7d7$5@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efb87$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efebb$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f0452$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f05fc$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f07d4$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,81249344387d138e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: "Norm Jaffe" <mail@aurelsystems.com>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
References: <432a4ce3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432e5ed4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ec891$2@newsgroups.borland.com> <janti1t9p5e1mv6f62e5flrqu6ffh5s5jk@4ax.com> <432ee858$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432ef7d7$5@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efb87$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <432efebb$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f0452$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f05fc$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <432f07d4$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Subject: Re: process in memory
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:17:22 -0700
Lines: 29
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.20.48.229
Message-ID: <432f0e32$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1127157298 154.20.48.229 (19 Sep 2005 12:14:58 -0700)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

Reply to Parent Message