Re: overloading constructors in inherited forms

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade

Article #2444

Back to borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade Previous Next

#2444

From: Liz Albin
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00

13 lines
1056 bytes

Hi Stuart,
I (and lots of others no doubt) have done what you describe -- that is, used
my own constructors for forms -- with little or no difficulty.  Which leads
me to the point: it's possible there's something peculiar in your set up.
Would you to send to the ng a very small program that demonstrates the
problem?  If you do, someone will look it over, and perhaps have a more
useful comment than mine.  (Mine being "well I did it, so you should be able
to!")


good luck

liz

Technical Details

Message-ID: <82gpk7$5ph11@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <82go8a$5p416@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10529a,2b0adff5887013fc
X-Google-Attributes: gid10529a,public
From: "Liz Albin" <Elizabeth.Albin@bowne.com>
Subject: Re: overloading constructors in inherited forms
Date: 1999/12/06
Message-ID: <82gpk7$5ph11@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 557322971
References: <82go8a$5p416@forums.borland.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade

Reply to Parent Message