Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
Article #2447Re: overloading constructors in inherited forms
From: stuart kruse
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:00
19 lines
1256 bytes
1256 bytes
Yes Liz, the second paramter is an int.....and unsigned int actually.............is there any work around this problem? it seems a pretty fundamental limitation if there isn't......... The joy of upgrading eh? never used to have any problems with Borland 3. Sometimes i wish they'd leave the interface alone on upgrades and spend more time fixing the bugs and 'features' Thanks though Liz, much appreciated Liz Albin wrote in message <82grf8$8s01@forums.borland.com>... >Hi Stuart, >Before I go overboard on this, is your second parm an int? There's some odd >problem with using (Component *, int) having to do with the delphi >constructor. > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<82grku$8rs1@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<82go8a$5p416@forums.borland.com> <82gpk7$5ph11@forums.borland.com> <82gqi4$5p512@forums.borland.com> <82grf8$8s01@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10529a,2b0adff5887013fc X-Google-Attributes: gid10529a,public From: "stuart kruse" <s.a.kruse@open.ac.uk> Subject: Re: overloading constructors in inherited forms Date: 1999/12/06 Message-ID: <82grku$8rs1@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 557335386 References: <82go8a$5p416@forums.borland.com> <82gpk7$5ph11@forums.borland.com> <82gqi4$5p512@forums.borland.com> <82grf8$8s01@forums.borland.com> Organization: open uni X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade