🚀 go-pugleaf

: "stuart kruse" <s.a.kruse@open.ac.uk> wrote:

>Yes Liz, the second paramter is an int
>is there any work around this problem? it seems a
>pretty fundamental limitation if there isn't.........

Actually there already *is* a constructor with the signature

  TComponent*, int

so the best you can do is not to use that signature for a constructor of
yours; use, for instance

  TComponent*, int, int Dummy

or

  int, TComponent*

or whatever else gets you out of the conflict with the existing
constructor.

-- 
General information:
  * Post to the right group - http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/
    * Do not cross- or multipost 
      * Research at http://www.mers.com/searchsite.html

Stefan Hoffmeister - http://www.econos.de/
(TeamB - http://www.teamb.com/)