Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
Article #597Re: For .NET -> Delphi 2005 ... and... What about for C++ Builder ?
From: Alisdair Meredith
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:14
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:14
53 lines
3073 bytes
3073 bytes
Wontola wrote: > I want to know if Borland will make some version of C++ Builder for > .NET, like Delphi 2005. Note that Microsoft are making the C++/CLI binding for .NET into an international standard through ECMA. While Borland have not yet announced if they will implement this standard, they are a member of the commitee <g> > Actually I use C++ Builder 5 Enterprise very well and never find any > problems, but the new goal for the company is migrate all aplications > to Microsoft .NET framework, I�m C/C++ programer and I want still use > Borland Compilers, but I can't find any information about the future > of C++ Builder 6, in this case. The next version of C++Builder will ship as 'the C++ personality' of the next version of Delphi: http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32845,00.html This version will probably target Win32 development, with .NET support to follow later. Nothing official yet, but based on the following comment in the C++Builder chat last month: http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32958,00.html drbob42: "when we see the C++Builder personality in the Delphi (BDS) IDE, will that mean a Win32 or a .NET C++ personality? (or both? ;-)" - additional work will happen for .NET after this Win32-supporting release > In this momment I don�t know what happend with C++ Builder and I know > VC.NET can create windows form�s now. Personally, I would not like to write for WinForms using managed C++. The C++/CLI binding that MS (and others) are now working on is a much better approach, but will not be available until VS.NET 2005 is released. It is a much neater and more complete solution. that effectively replaces managed C++ (which MS will continue to support for back compatibility only, not as an ongoing development) > Is the time for leave C++ Builder and I use VC ? > Is the time for leave this community ? Right now I would say not - neither does .NET very well so I would wait and see the next version of both products, and then decide. I would not like to pick any current product for .NET development in C++. AlisdairM(TeamB)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<42453618@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling.newsfeeds.com!in.nntp.be!caladan.landsraad.net!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4241ab7b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10529a,517f2b95e5857aae X-Google-Attributes: gid10529a,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII From: "Alisdair Meredith" <alisdair.meredith@no-spam-splease@uk.renaultf1.com> Subject: Re: For .NET -> Delphi 2005 ... and... What about for C++ Builder ? Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade References: <4241ab7b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> User-Agent: XanaNews/1.16.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.43.146.219 Message-ID: <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com> Date: 26 Mar 2005 02:14:48 -0800 X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1111832088 217.43.146.219 (26 Mar 2005 02:14:48 -0800) Lines: 53 X-Authenticated-User: ameredith Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling.newsfeeds.com!in.nntp.be!caladan.landsraad.net!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail