🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
Article #598

Re: For .NET -> Delphi 2005 ... and... What about for C++ Builder ?

#598
From: Wontola
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:16
65 lines
3427 bytes
Thanks a lot for your comments Alisdair, I really appreciate this...

Muchas gracias por tu informaci�n.

Alisdair Meredith wrote:
> Wontola wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>I want to know if Borland will make some version of C++ Builder for
>>.NET, like Delphi 2005.
> 
> 
> Note that Microsoft are making the C++/CLI binding for .NET into an
> international standard through ECMA.  While Borland have not yet
> announced if they will implement this standard, they are a member of
> the commitee <g>
> 
>>Actually I use C++ Builder 5 Enterprise very well and never find any
>>problems, but the new goal for the company is migrate all aplications
>>to Microsoft .NET framework, I�m C/C++ programer and I want still use
>>Borland Compilers, but I can't find any information about the future
>>of C++ Builder 6, in this case.
> 
> 
> The next version of C++Builder will ship as 'the C++ personality' of
> the next version of Delphi:
> 
> http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32845,00.html
> 
> 
> This version will probably target Win32 development, with .NET support
> to follow later.  Nothing official yet, but based on the following
> comment in the C++Builder chat last month:
> 
> http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32958,00.html
> 
> drbob42: "when we see the C++Builder personality in the Delphi (BDS)
> IDE, will that mean a Win32 or a .NET C++ personality? (or both? ;-)"
>  - additional work will happen for .NET after this Win32-supporting
> release
> 
> 
> 
>>In this momment I don�t know what happend with C++ Builder and I know
>>VC.NET can create windows form�s now.
> 
> 
> Personally, I would not like to write for WinForms using managed C++.
> The C++/CLI binding that MS (and others) are now working on is a much
> better approach, but will not be available until VS.NET 2005 is
> released.  It is a much neater and more complete solution. that
> effectively replaces managed C++ (which MS will continue to support for
> back compatibility only, not as an ongoing development)
> 
> 
>>Is the time for leave C++ Builder and I use VC ?
>>Is the time for leave this community ?
> 
> 
> Right now I would say not - neither does .NET very well so I would wait
> and see the next version of both products, and then decide.  I would
> not like to pick any current product for .NET development in C++.
> 
> AlisdairM(TeamB)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <42465de2$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail
References: <4241ab7b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10529a,517f2b95e5857aae
X-Google-Attributes: gid10529a,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 01:16:49 +0100
From: Wontola <ctapase@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
Subject: Re: For .NET -> Delphi 2005 ... and... What about for C++ Builder
 ?
References: <4241ab7b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com>
In-Reply-To: <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.135.223.44
Message-ID: <42465de2$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1111907810 201.135.223.44 (26 Mar 2005 23:16:50 -0800)
Lines: 65
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail