Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
Article #598Re: For .NET -> Delphi 2005 ... and... What about for C++ Builder ?
From: Wontola
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:16
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:16
65 lines
3427 bytes
3427 bytes
Thanks a lot for your comments Alisdair, I really appreciate this... Muchas gracias por tu informaci�n. Alisdair Meredith wrote: > Wontola wrote: > > > >>I want to know if Borland will make some version of C++ Builder for >>.NET, like Delphi 2005. > > > Note that Microsoft are making the C++/CLI binding for .NET into an > international standard through ECMA. While Borland have not yet > announced if they will implement this standard, they are a member of > the commitee <g> > >>Actually I use C++ Builder 5 Enterprise very well and never find any >>problems, but the new goal for the company is migrate all aplications >>to Microsoft .NET framework, I�m C/C++ programer and I want still use >>Borland Compilers, but I can't find any information about the future >>of C++ Builder 6, in this case. > > > The next version of C++Builder will ship as 'the C++ personality' of > the next version of Delphi: > > http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32845,00.html > > > This version will probably target Win32 development, with .NET support > to follow later. Nothing official yet, but based on the following > comment in the C++Builder chat last month: > > http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32958,00.html > > drbob42: "when we see the C++Builder personality in the Delphi (BDS) > IDE, will that mean a Win32 or a .NET C++ personality? (or both? ;-)" > - additional work will happen for .NET after this Win32-supporting > release > > > >>In this momment I don�t know what happend with C++ Builder and I know >>VC.NET can create windows form�s now. > > > Personally, I would not like to write for WinForms using managed C++. > The C++/CLI binding that MS (and others) are now working on is a much > better approach, but will not be available until VS.NET 2005 is > released. It is a much neater and more complete solution. that > effectively replaces managed C++ (which MS will continue to support for > back compatibility only, not as an ongoing development) > > >>Is the time for leave C++ Builder and I use VC ? >>Is the time for leave this community ? > > > Right now I would say not - neither does .NET very well so I would wait > and see the next version of both products, and then decide. I would > not like to pick any current product for .NET development in C++. > > AlisdairM(TeamB)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<42465de2$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4241ab7b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10529a,517f2b95e5857aae X-Google-Attributes: gid10529a,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 01:16:49 +0100 From: Wontola <ctapase@hotmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade Subject: Re: For .NET -> Delphi 2005 ... and... What about for C++ Builder ? References: <4241ab7b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com> In-Reply-To: <42453618@newsgroups.borland.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.135.223.44 Message-ID: <42465de2$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1111907810 201.135.223.44 (26 Mar 2005 23:16:50 -0800) Lines: 65 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail