Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
Article #7How different is Builder from Borland C++ V5?
From: Rich Mynick
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:18
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:18
11 lines
1501 bytes
1501 bytes
Hi all, Could some kind soul offer a few general words as to how substantial the differences really are between the C++ (of almost 5 years ago, which still seems like an enormously capable program to me), and today's latest Builder version? I don't want to be clinging to an obsolete tool that I've grown very comfortable with -- but need some solid reason to persuade me that there's more to Builder than just the fact that it's the "latest thing." Thanks for any comments -- RichM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3AFC2D0F.355DDA17@home.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dnewsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10fbec,85cd8cfec02b6d4a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10fbec,public X-Google-Thread: 10529a,85cd8cfec02b6d4a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10529a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-11 11:44:12 PST Message-ID: <3AFC2D0F.355DDA17@home.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:18:55 -0700 From: Rich Mynick <Rmynick@home.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade,borland.public.cppbuilder.ide Subject: How different is Builder from Borland C++ V5? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.12.43.122 X-Trace: dnews 989605161 24.12.43.122 (11 May 2001 11:19:21 -0700) Lines: 12 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dnews