Re: JDK 1.2 beta, can JBuilder use?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #19447

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#19447

From: Bryan E. Boone
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 00:00

22 lines
1365 bytes

Yeah...
That is one expensive text editor.  Especially since the version
of JBuilder won't even compile my 1.1 code written with a text
editor and a JDK.  ....And they want to charge for the their bug fixes
in their compiler ???!!!  Something's not quite right.

So what do I do?  Bag Borland, swear it off (again), and kick myself
for trying it again.  I was one of the ones that got hosed with their
"improvements" of OWL 1.0 to OWL 2.0 in C++.

Fool me once shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

Shame on me!

Joe Nuxoll wrote in message <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com>...
>M.Wannamaker wrote:
>> Borland really needs to get a process to add new jdk's from SUN.
>
>100% agree.  100% on the case.
>
> - Joe Nuxoll

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6b4uqc$5488@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<6a3ok3$jhs7@forums.borland.com> <34CF6D8F.7445F6E8@borland.com> <34D10E62.F3FB574C@corp.borland.com> <6argvt$62v$1@newsbell.bellglobal.com> <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,a9c30db1a74f3eab
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "Bryan E. Boone" <sasbeb@wnt.sas.com>
Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 beta, can JBuilder use?
Date: 1998/02/02
Message-ID: <6b4uqc$5488@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 321402460
References: <6a3ok3$jhs7@forums.borland.com> <34CF6D8F.7445F6E8@borland.com> <34D10E62.F3FB574C@corp.borland.com> <6argvt$62v$1@newsbell.bellglobal.com> <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: None
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message