🚀 go-pugleaf

Bryan:

Well, before you go would you like to share the code that doesn't
compile and the error message?

-Rich

Bryan E. Boone wrote:
> 
> Yeah...
> That is one expensive text editor.  Especially since the version
> of JBuilder won't even compile my 1.1 code written with a text
> editor and a JDK.  ....And they want to charge for the their bug fixes
> in their compiler ???!!!  Something's not quite right.
> 
> So what do I do?  Bag Borland, swear it off (again), and kick myself
> for trying it again.  I was one of the ones that got hosed with their
> "improvements" of OWL 1.0 to OWL 2.0 in C++.
> 
> Fool me once shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.
> 
> Shame on me!
> 
> Joe Nuxoll wrote in message <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com>...
> >M.Wannamaker wrote:
> >> Borland really needs to get a process to add new jdk's from SUN.
> >
> >100% agree.  100% on the case.
> >
> > - Joe Nuxoll

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rich Wilkman
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
Borland JBuilder Team

If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
it's mine and mine alone.

Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=