Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #11705Re: avoiding jbcl?
From: Michael A. Long
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
13 lines
1262 bytes
1262 bytes
I agree, been known to use them myself. They are an easy way to whip out a quick data structure. Tor Iver Wilhelmsen wrote in message ... >"Michael A. Long" <mlong@ecst.csuchico.edu> writes: > >> Inner classes: The poor mans obfuscator. > >Well, they don't do very much more than to "shorten" some helper >classes that you otherwise would have placed in a package scope. I >find them useful, since their advantage over other helper classes - in >addition to the syntactic sugar coating - is that you can limit >visibility in a better way (they can be made protected).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7fjl2q$3mi4@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7es8v5$ar04@forums.borland.com> <MPG.117e8cb0812f5fe1989b75@forums.inprise.com> <37150ADA.27E1790F@inprise.com> <uogkqqr0f.fsf@sds.no> <371605CD.6CD470FB@inprise.com> <7fas7j$oe93@forums.borland.com> <upv51nfo4.fsf@sds.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,adb18793a260417f X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: "Michael A. Long" <mlong@ecst.csuchico.edu> Subject: Re: avoiding jbcl? Date: 1999/04/20 Message-ID: <7fjl2q$3mi4@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 469006461 References: <7es8v5$ar04@forums.borland.com> <MPG.117e8cb0812f5fe1989b75@forums.inprise.com> <37150ADA.27E1790F@inprise.com> <uogkqqr0f.fsf@sds.no> <371605CD.6CD470FB@inprise.com> <7fas7j$oe93@forums.borland.com> <upv51nfo4.fsf@sds.no> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: California State University, Chico Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing